View more on these topics

Editor’s comment of the week: Will FCA address past failings?

Online comment relating to online column: Aifa: The dangers of a meddling regulator

So, the FCA’s new approach intends to address all past failings of the FSA. Wow. All of them? That is a pretty massive mission statement. Where will it start? The list of failings to be addressed is long indeed.

Will it start by living up to the claims on the FSA’s website to being “an open and transparent regulator”? Or will this claim be conveniently omitted from the FCA’s website home page?

Will it observe the requirements of the statutory code of practice for regulators (which the FSA totally ignores)?

Will it make a sincere attempt to reduce its budget by relocating three-quarters of its staff to vastly less expensive accommodation well away from E14? Will it scrap the £20m-plus it earmarks each year for staff and directors’ bonuses of highly questionable merit?

Will it from now on publish all feedback received in response to its consultations, for all to see and to debate in open forum? Will it actually take any notice of that feedback? Or will it continue to regard (and dismiss) them as being based merely on self interest?

Will it scrap proposed new initiatives if its cost benefit analyses are found to have been a wildly inaccurate understatement of the true costs (as seen with the RDR)?

Will it take responsibility for the consequences of any motorway pile-ups that it should have anticipated and averted but which it fails to (instead of dumping the costs onto the IFA sector)? In any future cases where the findings of an Arrow visit have not been acted upon, will it offer an explanation as to just why?

Will it put an end to its practice of reviewing everything by hindsight and holding everybody else to account for its failure to have issued proper guidance?

Will it issue an unequivocal undertaking not to twist round provider failures to being intermediary failures (as the FSA has done with KeyData)?

Will it undertake not to direct the FSCS to make blanket assumptions of misselling on matters such as Arch cru and to pay compensation willy-nilly without allowing the normal complaints process to run its proper course?

Will it undertake not to instruct the FSCS to engage firms of lawyers to issue to IFA firms unsubstantiated demands for payment without being in possession of proper evidence of bad sales practices?

Will it admit that the MAS – launched without either a consultation or any cost benefit analysis – has been a hugely costly and ineffective white elephant and scrap it?

Will it discard the FSA’s patently mendacious claim to being a body independent of the Government?

Will it – as a body supposedly in favour of accountability – actively participate in the creation of an independent regulatory oversight committee to the will of which it will be statutorily obliged to submit?

Will individuals within the FCA be named, shamed and sanctioned when found to have failed in their duties?

Will it publish for all to see and to debate in open forum just how much of Hector Sants’ estimated £50m the transition from FSA to FCA actually ends up costing in practice?

Will it take the side of the industry in lobbying the Government on issues such as its failure to honour the Conservative party’s pre-election manifesto pledge to put right all the damage done to the pensions framework by successive governments over the past 25 years and finally to enact true simplification measures to restore some scrap of public confidence in long term saving for retirement?

Will the FCA provide answers to any of these questions? Or is this undertaking to address “all past failings” of the FSA just a bit of window dressing to kid us that the FCA is actually going to be something better, more cost-effective and more accountable than an FSA Part II?

If it does not, then Mr Wheatley can hardly be surprised if the FCA is viewed in very much the same light as its reviled and discredited predecessor.

Julian Stevens


John Malone: Industry still waiting for MMR update

By now, many of us in the mortgage industry were expecting to see the outcome of the feedback submitted to the FSA mortgage market review consultation papers in March.  The FSA had initially suggested that by this summer we would be working through the final outcomes. There were about 120 submissions from the advice industry, […]


MAS referred 0.3% of web visitors to advisers

The Money Advice Service referred less than 1 per cent of consumers who visited its website in 2011/12 to a financial adviser. The MAS’s first annual review, published yesterday, outlines how it is delivering on its key areas of money advice, co-ordinating debt advice and financial education. Based on a total of 1.1 million website […]


House prices grow three times faster than wages

Average house prices have soared 94 per cent over the last 10 years, while wages have grown just 29 per cent over the same period, according to the National Housing Federation. Research by the NHF shows average house prices have almost doubled from £121,769 in 2001 to £236,518 in 2011, while the average wage has […]

European investor outlook worsens for high-yield bonds

High-yield bonds remain the most popular investment choice among European fixed-income managers, although more investors are developing a negative outlook for the asset class. Fitch Ratings’ credit market investor survey shows that 21 per cent of fund managers voted high-yield as their top investment choice for the third quarter of the year. Although this is […]

Apple: a stellar technology story

By Ali Unwin, head of technology sector research

Apple recently announced the highest-ever recorded quarterly net profit ($18bn), with the sale of 74.4 million iPhones helping the company deliver $74.6bn of revenue for the quarter ending December 2014. These sales were largely driven by strong demand for the new iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus. Highlights included Chinese iPhone sales doubling year-on-year and unit growth of 44% in the US — supposedly a well-penetrated market. Apple ended the quarter with $178bn in cash on its balance sheet, having generated a staggering $30bn in free cash flow during the quarter.

At Neptune, we have been long-term believers in the Apple story, and continue to hold the stock in a number of our portfolios based on the company’s long-term growth prospects. This is predicated on our belief that Apple has proved thus far that it can — unusually for a consumer electronics company — maintain high margins for a sustained period of time, even as adoption of new technology slows down and competitors produce similar-specification products.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Blinking brilliant Julian – ’nuff said!

  2. Well said Julian. You have them well sussed but I suspect this is just another of those soundbites so beloved by the regulator.
    They probably just mean that where the FSA failed in annhilating all IFAs’, they will address that particular failing.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm