View more on these topics

Economists turn on Osborne’s economic plans

Economists that previously backed chancellor George Osborne’s deficit reduction programme are now calling on him to change his plans and boost the economy through spending.

On 14 February 2010, 20 economists wrote to the Sunday Times backing Osborne’s policy to eliminate the structural deficit over the course of the parliament.

The Conservative MP hailed the letter as a “really significant moment in the economic debate” at the time.

Hoever nine of the signatories are now calling on Osborne to boost growth through tax cuts and infrastructure spending.

Capital Economics managing director Roger Bootle told the New Statesman: “If I were chancellor at this point, I would alter the plan, I would stop the cuts to public investment and I might even seek to increase it.

“The key thing is to try and get the private sector to spend its money and that may require a bit of Government spending to prime the pump.”

London School of Economics professor of economics Danny Quah says he no longer supports the deficit reduction programme and Cambridge University emeritus professor of economics David Newbury is calling for the Government to spend money to boost growth.

Professors of economics at York, Cambridge and Harvard universities and the London School of Economics have also reversed their calls for cuts and criticised the chancellor’s plans.

Oxford University professor of economics and chair of the Independent Commission on Banking Sir John Vickers has also refused to back Government spending plans again when asked.

Backbench Liberal Democrat MPs John Pugh, Annette Brooke and John Leech told the FT the Government should change course on its spending plans as pressure mounts on deputy prime minister Nick Clegg to influence the economic plans.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. 1. reverse the decision on the London/Glasgow train service
    2. cancel the London/Birmingham fast train white elephant – which will cost £75BN – invest the “£25BN” in eg linking up the water companies to tansfer resources in times of drought
    3. reduce Business Rates in the High Streets
    4. reduce the rate of VAT
    5. replace Mr Osborne asap

  2. Good suggestions above, though the problem with reducing VAT (I learned just the other day) is that the EU has imposed a minmum rate of 15% and, as seen in the recent past, lowering it to 15% isn’t sufficient to revive consumer spending. It needs to go to 10% but we can’t.

    Apart from the objectionability of UK taxation policy being dictated by Brussels, I’m still waiting to see any examples at all of how the UK has benefitted from EU membership. We should never have joined and, as far as I’m concerned, we’d better off leaving. Just what is the rationale for staying in? We sure as hell don’t hear anything these days from Ken Clarke about what a great thing full EU membership would be for the UK, do we?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm