View more on these topics

Dynamic Planner adapts risk tools to meet Mifid II demands

Tablet-Technology-Computer-Business-700x450.jpgRisk profiling and financial planning tool Dynamic Planner has redesigned its risk assessment questionnaire to better meet Mifid II requirements around suitability.

The process, which was launched at the firm’s annual conference on Wednesday (31 January), will now include 15 psychometric attitude to risk questions and will focus less on people’s general understanding of finance.

The questionnaire was written in collaboration with academics from the International Capital Market Association Centre at Henley Business School.

The new questions should be easier for clients to understand, Dynamic Planner says, and will relate less to specific investment choices.

Rather than being perceived as a test of financial knowledge, the questions will now be reworked to show pure attitude to risk.

Accumulation and decumulation stages will be accounted for, as will both existing and new clients.

Adviser can still use the previous questionnaires but also use the new one.

DT, which runs Dynamic Planner, has conducted research to find 93 per cent of clients can be expected to move by no more than one risk level after using the new questionnaire while 50 per cent of clients can be expected to remain the same.

This compares with 41 per cent of people using the existing questionnaires whose risk profiles move over several years.

Dynamic Planner head of intermediary account management James Smith says: “This new questionnaire is an evolution of our existing profile process, and is the result of 16 months of research, development and user feedback. It will help investment managers and professionals to fulfil their Mifid II requirements for suitability and appropriateness.”

Independent consultant and former FCA director Rory Percival warned advisers last year about the discrepancies between and limitations of risk profiling tools.

In a report he produced in September 2017, he assessed six tools: A2Risk, EValue, Dynamic Planner, FinaMetrica, Morningstar and Oxford Risk.

Percival said at the time: “Advisers shouldn’t solely rely on the outcome of the tools, and assume the job done.

“Under Mifid II, advisers must review these assessments and ensure they are fit for purpose. Part of our aim in producing this report is to help advisers determine whether an assessment or recommended portfolio is fit for purpose. It should also enable advisers to identify and mitigate potential risks when using these tools.”



FOS orders compensation over Sipp transfer to Ucis

The Financial Ombudsman Service has told a firm to compensate a client who was advised to transfer their Sipp into an unregulated collective investment scheme.     The client, referred to as Mr C, complained that advice he received from The Citimark Partnership to invest funds from his Sipp into an Ucis was unsuitable. Mr C […]


Network Personal Touch acquired for £4.8m

Adviser network Personal Touch has been bought by estate agency business LSL Property Services in a deal worth £4.8m. Through the deal, LSL acquires Personal Touch Financial Services and subsidiary Personal Touch Administration Services from Personal Touch Holdings. LSL must also pay an acquired intercompany debt of £600,000. It will pay £2.8m on completion of […]


How much are advisers charging for pension transfers?

Defined benefit pension transfer charges are being put under the microscope again as the regulator turns over more potential conflicts of interest. With the British Steel Pension Scheme the latest to dominate headlines and the FCA ready to interrogate further as it extends its review to include all firms authorised to give pension transfer advice, […]

Trade body pulls ‘Loch Ness’ statement after campaigner pressure

The Investment Association has taken down the press release that likened funds’ hidden charges to the ‘Loch Ness Monster’ of the investment sector after mounting pressure from transparency campaigners. This month, following the implementation of Mifid II, research exposed some fund managers’ costs increase at least two times beyond the ongoing charges figure. Industry experts […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment