View more on these topics

Dual to the death?

In a competitive market, how far should your business go to gain advantage? Should you pursue opportunities for growth and increased market share, even if it compromises your corporate principles, values and vision? How long can you persist in positioning your business as a good corporate citizen when you are seeking to put your rivals out of business?

These are a few of the questions that lenders should be asking themselves as they seek to exploit the limited lending availability and bring about their own version of a correction in the distribution balance in the market.

In the age of treating customers fairly, it is inconceivable that lenders are being allowed to compromise the intermediary channel which accounts for 85 per cent of the market. However, that is exactly what they are doing with dual-pricing.

Dual-pricing in itself is not the issue. Sure, it is annoying but we operate in a free market. However, there is an additional sting in the tail. Not only are lenders offering more competitive deals exclusively through their own branches but rumour has it that staff are contacting clients introduced by brokers and selling exclusive products over brokers’ heads.

As the RDR rumbles on, with its anticipated read across to the mortgage market, lenders are not doing the industry any favours with their sales – as opposed to advice – strategy. They are not only compromising the intermediary channel, that is best placed to offer advice, but threatening its survival.

Dual-pricing has led to talk of a new disclosure requirement – to advise clients that there are better deals if they go direct – and concerns that this move would seriously undermine the service that the majority of intermediaries set out to provide.

Those brokers who are taking enforced leave during this period because they cannot compete with direct deals have missed the point. They should review their remuneration strategy rather than shut up shop. If brokers charge a fee for their advice, it is immaterial whether the client goes direct to the lender.

There is a fine line between competitive and anti-competitive behaviour. Lenders which persist in these dirty tricks are at risk of sacrificing an important channel.

Do not forget that lenders are not equipped to deal with high lending volumes – that is why they have been happy to run with a form of outsourcing which is brokers completing the paperwork and other elements of admin. Like the Terminator – or Indiana Jones – they will be back. Let us hope there are enough of us left to welcome them back with open arms.

Gerry O’Brien is a director at Home of Choice


The Day of (B)reckoning

A period of exceptional uncertainty started last Friday for the UK, including a fierce leadership battle in a deeply divided Conservative party, the timing of the trigger of the EU’s Article 50, as well as a potential referendum in Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Click here to read the full article


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm