View more on these topics

Don’t leave it to trust

I have just become a partner in a law firm and in my new role I have been asked to review a number of trusts that the firm acts for. In a number of these cases, one of our senior partners is a trustee and the trust monies are managed by a local stockbroker, with whom the partner has had a good personal relationship over many years. These trusts do not appear to be actively reviewed and I am concerned that we may not be complying with the requirements of the Trustee Act 2000. What can I do to prevent this becoming a problem?

It would appear that many of these trusts were set up several years ago and the landscape has changed significantly since then. I think you are very sensible in being concerned about this, as it may mean that you personally could face problems that result from the possible non-compliance by one of the firm’s other partners. It is probably worth reviewing the changes that have been introduced by the Trustee Act 2000 to identify potential areas of concern and possible solutions.

Before the Trustee Act 2000, the key piece of legislation was the Trustee Investment Act 1961 which laid down a specified approach for the investment decisions that trustees needed to take, in the absence of broader powers granted in the trust document itself.

This approach was not always serving the best interests of the beneficiaries so the Trustee Act 2000 was introduced. This new act gave trustees wide powers of investment, broadly as if they were investing the funds in their own personal capacity.

However, the granting of greater investment freedom to trustees was counterbalanced by a range of formal obligations.

The Trustee Act 2000 requires trustees to exercise reasonable skill and care and defines the standard investment criteria for a trust as:


  • The suitability of investments.
  • The need for diversification.


It also requires trustees to keep investments under review and to obtain and consider proper advice to ensure that the standard investment criteria are met.

In addition to the particular requirements of the act, you should also take account of the financial planning implications of trustees’ common law responsibilities that operate in parallel with the requirements of the Trustee Act 2000. These duties include taking account of tax considerations including the tax status of the beneficiaries and ensuring fairness between different categories of beneficiary.

There is also an issue with the use of a stockbroker for the investments as problems have been identified with this style of investment, including the fact it is less tax-efficient than collective investments, it is often less well diversified than portfolios of collectives and stockbrokers have an incentive to trade unnecessarily, thereby incurring excessive costs.

Turning now to possible solutions, I would suggest that you consider adopting a trust review service, which would help to formalise the trustees’ approach to ensure they meet all the requirements of the act and provide an audit trail that clearly documents the steps being taken to ensure compliance with the act.

The overall objective of the service would be to carry out a detailed analysis of the firm’s current trustee investment portfolios and highlight any areas of concern in relation to the Trustee Act 2000.

This would ensure that the trustees were meeting the requirements of the act and that the rationale for any changes to the investment portfolio were clearly documented in a manner that significantly reduces the likelihood of them facing any future complaints from the underlying beneficiaries.

As it is difficult for most investment portfolios to outperform significantly in all investment climates, it is equally important that areas such as tax-efficiency and diversification are properly considered and reviewed on a regular basis within a consistent structure.

The trust review service should also provide, on a regular basis, a suitability report which will look beyond just the investment performance and focus on the wider ranging requirements of the act.

This report should formally review, in detail, the following areas:


  • Suitability of the investment assets to meet the trust’s objectives.
  • Suitability of the trust assets in relation to the current and likely future investment climate.
  • The diversification strategy by asset class, geography, fund manager and product type.
  • Taxation position of the current assets and summary of the tax-effectiveness of the assets being held.
  • Suitability of the existing benchmark and historical performance against this.
  • The strategy for formal trust reviews and the documentation produced.
  • Overall summary of the current position in relation to all aspects of the Trustee Act 2000.


It is my belief that only a review of this depth on an annual basis will ensure that all aspects of the act are complied with and I would strongly recommend that you consider operating such a service.

Patrick Murphy is director of wealth management at Thinc

Recommended

Kensington to increase medium to heavy LTV adverse rates by 1.5 per cent

Kensington has confirmed it will be adjusting its sub-prime criteria from Friday as revealed by Money Marketing online last week.The lender will be increasing fixed-rates on all near prime, near prime max, very low 90 per cent LTV products by 0.5 per cent but says that there will be no changes to its near-prime products […]

Speed traps

Last week, I indicated the increasing dominance of the stockmarket by investment professionals was behind the upsurge in share volatility. With hindsight, this appears a little oversimplistic. There have been other changes that add to the potential for wide swings in indices and the value attributed to individual companies.

PSigma set for US large-cap launch

PSigma has recruited former Credit Suisse manager James Abate to set up a large-cap US equity growth fund.Abate made his name managing the Credit Suisse Trans-atlantic fund before moving to GAM where he ran an American focus equity fund.He currently runs New York-based boutique Centre Asset Management and will run the PSigma fund from his […]

Cofunds lobbying for tax-free bond transfers

Cofunds is to petition HM Revenue & Customs to allow investors to transfer funds within a bond wrapper without risking a tax penalty.The platform is linking up with the Tax Incentivised Savings Association to call for tax-exempt transfers within bonds similar to Isas and pensions.The move follows the news that leading platform providers will allow […]

Guide

Guide: how to change your auto-enrolment support

As we approach the two-year milestone of auto-enrolment, employers have had the opportunity to truly assess the capabilities of their chosen support. They are also now realising that getting to the staging date was the easy part, and that support is required for almost every aspect of the day to day running of their scheme. With the three-year re-enrolment window coinciding for many with the total removal of commission and Active Member Discounts from pension-related products and services, as well as the introduction of the pension charge cap in April 2015, many employers will have no choice but to review their support options. But, what is involved in transitioning your auto-enrolment scheme away from your current support options? This guide from Johnson Fleming aims to outline some of these key areas and provide information and discussion points on what you need to consider.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment