View more on these topics

Don’t be retrospective on group pension commissions

The pensions minister proposes today a 0.75 per cent cap on auto-enrolment pension scheme charges. Steve Webb is an academic who has never worked in business nor created a job, yet he appears to be unchallenged in Parliament and the media about the effect of all his late changes. To summarise:

  • Auto-enrolment proposals are some years old, and implementation started in October 2012.
  • Commission was allowed to remain on existing group pensions, consultancy charging was allowed on new ones and there were no proposals for charge capping.
  • Webb banned consultancy charging earlier this year, and now, more than a year into auto-enrolment rules, proposes restricting charges (hence banning thousands of existing pension schemes).

Imagine a company that has a perfectly good pension scheme with say a 0.9 per cent charge, all ready for its imminent staging date, perhaps paying 5 per cent employer contribution (there are thousands of schemes like this), yet Webb comes along and plucks 0.75 per cent out of the air, with no idea of the consequences. 

Said company then has to implement a new pension scheme and bear all the set-up costs (possibly now to include paying thousands for software that would have been provided by the insurer), perhaps right on or even past the staging date. 

Such companies are also highly likely to try to recoup some of this extra cost by reducing employer contribution, possibly to the minimum 1 per cent. But, hey, the member will be better off because the charge is lower – right on.

Auto-enrolment, when it hits small companies, will attract much less positive headlines than now. Smaller companies are only just waking up to how much these rules will cost to implement; many will close as they will not be able to afford the compliance costs. Yet no one in government has the foresight to see the additional damage Webb is causing with retrospective changes.

Let’s not forget that employers already have the right to replace pension schemes with “cheaper” ones if they wish. By all means put a charge cap on new schemes (with plenty of notice) but do not put one on existing schemes.   

Mark Osland





Ex-Montpelier directors pursue advisers over claims

An advice firm which has taken on the liabilities of the collapsed Montpelier Group and is made up of former Montpelier directors has instructed solicitors to pursue claims against ex-advisers. West Midlands-based firm Merito Financial Services, a member of Tenet Connect, took over the liabilities of Montpelier Group as a condition of taking the assets […]


David Hambidge looks to alternative investments

Premier Asset Management’s David Hambidge is taking more interest in alternative investments in his multi-manager range in order to access returns uncorrelated to traditional markets. Hambidge has taken exposure to catastrophe insurance, reinsurance and litigation finance across his range of funds, which includes the £223.6m Premier Multi Asset Distribution and £102.8m Premier Multi Asset Income […]

Govt sets out options on auto-enrol charge cap at 0.75%-1%

The Government has set out three proposals to cap auto-enrolment pension charges as part of efforts to ensure savers are not “ripped off” by insurance companies. The Government is consulting on a charge cap of 1 per cent or 0.75 per cent, or a two-tier “comply or explain” cap. Under the “comply or explain” proposal, […]

Loney-Phil-Royal London-2013

Royal London announces four-year cricket sponsorship deal

Royal London has announced a four-year deal with the England & Wales Cricket Board to sponsor one-day international cricket. The deal, which starts next year, will include the Royal London men’s and women’s one-day internationals, the Royal London one-day country cup, the Royal London national club hampionship, and the Royal London junior county cup. Royal London group […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Regrettably Mark Osland, you are right and his boss, Iain Duncan Smith is no better because he really has no qualifications for the job. We are led by people with little understanding and even fewer morals.
    How do these get elected ? They should be shown the way to the job centre at the next election. As well as your problem they condone the discriminative policy of freezing the state pensions of over 500,000 ex-pat pensioners who have all met the requirements for an indexed linked pension. But then robbing pensioners is easy is’nt it ?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm