View more on these topics

Dilnot: Govt should invest in LTC advice strategy

The Dilnot Commission has called on the Government to invest in a major information and advice strategy to help people when they need long-term care.

The Commission on Funding of Care and Support, set up by the Government a year ago and chaired by economist Andrew Dilnot, published its proposals on long-term care funding today.

The report confirms the recommendations trailed ahead of the report’s publication for a cap on individuals’ lifetime contributions to their social care costs of between £25,000 and £50,000, with £35,000 the recommended figure. When the cap is reached individuals would then be eligible for full state support.

Currently the means-tested threshold where people are required to fund the full costs of their care is £23,250. The commission recommends increasing this to £100,000.

It is also calling for people to contribute a standard amount to cover their general living costs, such as food and accommodation, in residential care. The commission suggests a maximum contribution figure of between £7,000 and £10,000 a year.

Launching the report this morning Lord Norman Warner, a member of the commission, said people are poorly informed about the options when it comes to long-term care, and often seek advice in a time of crisis.

He said an advice strategy on long-term care would look to address this.

In its report, the commission says: “The Government should develop a major new information and advice strategy to help when care needs arise. It is critical that the public has access to better, easy-to-understand and reliable information and advice about services and funding sources.”

The commission says this should be developed in partnership with charities, local government, and the financial services sector.

It adds: “As proposed by the Law Commission, a statutory duty should be placed on local authorities to provide information, advice and assistance services in their areas.

“These should be available to all people, irrespective of how their care is funded or provided.”

Speaking this morning, Dilnot said the reforms recommended should open up an opportunity for the financial sector to help people better plan for the costs of long-term care.

Dilnot added: “It has been clear for many years that the system needs reforming, and it needs reforming now. It was recognised by the coalition, and by the last Government. The industry and stakeholder community want to see something done here.

“We think it it is appropriate that there should be a period of discussion and debate, and then there needs to be a white paper. We expect a white paper by easter next year. That seems to be a reasonable timetable. Our sense is we are not alone in expecting change.”

The commission believes its proposals could be implemented by 2014.

Recommended

1

Strauss-Kahn ‘expected to be released from bail’

Prosecutors on the Dominique Strauss-Kahn case have agreed to free the former International Monetary Fund head on his own recognizance, according to reports. Sources told Bloomberg that Strauss-Kahn, who is accused of sexually assaulting a maid in Manhattan hotel room, will be released at his bail hearing in New York today. Although he will still […]

9

Government should pay for campaign on IFA merits

Recession and a dose of Panorama may be enough to consign poster-led bank advice to the scrapheap. Already, one major high-street bank has headed down the platform route. Does that leave the way clear for IFAs and financial planners as the sole providers of meaningful financial advice? I am increasingly seeing some very impressive financial […]

julie.jpg

Act on client feedback

Hopefully, my article last month got practices thinking about where the charge points in their advice process are going to be and what charging methods they are going to use, be it hourly rates, fixed fees or a percentage of assets. Having spent time previously on defining the adviser proposition, they should be good to […]

Royal London completes Royal Liver takeover

Royal London has completed its takeover of Royal Liver. The deal means the Royal Liver, the 161-year-old Liverpool-based insurer, will have its £3bn of assets swallowed up by its larger rival. Royal Liver’s members approved the proposed takeover by Royal London in May this year. Royal Liver’s 280 staff will also transfer to Royal London, […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Simon Chalk, LaterLiving 4th July 2011 at 12:23 pm

    Government would be wise to accept Dilnot’s recommendations on working closely with the private sector. More needs to be done to signpost people for advice. A unified equity release body for specialists would offer a logical resource for the public, should they consider using their own home to pay towards their contribution costs.

  2. Do I smell the next misselling scandal already ?

  3. Mr Dilnot’s recommendations appear to have solved problems that didn’t exist and failed to meet the very real issues that are affecting the hundreds of people we speak to each year.

    Take the ‘hotel bill’ for example. What is his £7-10K pa going to provide? The small home squeezed into a victorian house or the mansion with grounds?

    Also, is it reasonable to ask taxpayers to pay ‘hotel bills’ for people that have £100,000?

  4. Someone might also point out that the FSA via RDR is actually helping to significantly reduce the number of advisers available to help tackle this issue.

  5. Kevin – Don’t worry, the MAS will advise them over the telephone and the internet and you will pay them to do it Kevin. Don’t worry, you;ll be able to afford to do it as you’ll have a Level 4 and be able to charge more as a result and with your CF8 exam in long term care, you’ll be able to charge even more.
    Sorry, just woken up and realised you’ll be competing against a state established quango funded by yoru money, so sooner or later they’ll but you out of business and in turn themselves as they’ll then have to charge tax instead of a levy.

Leave a comment