View more on these topics

Diamond: I do not feel personally culpable

Bob Diamond TSC 480

Barclays chief executive Bob Diamond has said he does not feel personally culpable over the Libor fixing scandal.

Last week, Barclays was fined £290m by the FSA and US authorities for rigging the Libor and Euribor rates. The £59.5m fine from the FSA was the largest in its history. Barclays was also fined £128m by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission and £102.6m by the US Department of Justice, bringing the total fine levied against Barclays to £290.1m

Diamond was head of Barclays’ investment arm Barclays Capital at the time the rigging went on and resigned as the bank’s chief executive yesterday. According to the FSA’s report there were over 250 requests to Barclays traders to manipulate the rate. Diamond said this is down to a small number of individuals in the bank, who behaved “abhorrently”.

Giving evidence to the Treasury select committee this afternoon, Diamond agreed the culture in a bank comes from the top but said he does not feel personally culpable.

He said: “I was responsible for Barclays Capital at the time and I was responsible for Barclays until yesterday but that is different to personal culpability. What I do feel is a very strong sense of responsibility that when we find mistakes we recognise them.”

Diamond once said the culture of an institution is demonstrated by what goes on when nobody is watching. TSC member and Labour MP Teresa Pearce asked Diamond if he still believed this.

“I still believe that but we have had some exceptions to that,” he said.

TSC member Andrea Leadsom accused Diamond of living in a “parallel universe” for thinking that there was not a widespread problem with the culture at Barclays.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Exasperated Me 4th July 2012 at 10:41 pm

    Of course he doesn’t feel personally culpable, his mates at the FSA will make sure he escapes with his finances intact.

    Pity they can’t do the same for the victims.

  2. Maybe I’m a bit naive but when there is a marked change in rates, the anomoly would be brought to the attention of the head of the department who would be advised of the reasons for the anomoly and would also be ‘aware’ of the prevailing circumstance so that they would ‘sign off’ on that. having said that, we assume that a highly paid person like Diamond actually knew what he was doing or is he just incompetent?

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com