View more on these topics

Delving into default pension funds

Default pension funds vary greatly in terms of investment approach, manager structure, performance and charging

Around nine out of 10 people rely on their pension provider’s default fund to save for their retirement, making it important to keep track of what is on offer.

We recently carried out an update to our study comparing the largest default funds by assets under management. As table 1 shows, these are all multi-asset, although to varying extents.

Investment approach

All contain equities and fixed income, while some hold alternative assets too. Alternatives offer greater potential for higher returns and diversification, but they can be more risky, expensive and less transparent.

In terms of an active or passive investment approach, there is a noticeable mix.

Performance

Auto-enrolment has only been running since 2012 and just six of the funds in our study have a five-year history. Ten have three-year numbers. As table 2 shows, annualised returns varied from 3.1 per cent to 11.8 per cent in the three years to the end of September. Disparity in performance remained after adjusting for the risk taken by each fund, both total risk and downside risk only.

Charges

There is also a variation in charges, with some funds having a relatively high annual management charge and others having a lower AMC but an initial contribution charge or fixed monthly administration charge too (see table 3).

The latter types tend to work better in terms of overall charges over the longer term (20 years or more), as there is time for the additional charges to become diluted. Those with the fixed monthly administration charge fare better with a larger pension pot, as the charge will form a lower portion of the bigger pot.

Manager structure

Finally, there is a mix of manager structure across the funds, with some keeping fund management in-house, either using managers from elsewhere within the organisation or investing directly in securities, while a few completely outsource to external managers and others use both in-house and third parties.

So, there is great variety. With some of these attributes, such as manager structure and investment approach, the choice of fund will come down to the attitudes of the employer or their adviser. But in terms of the other, more objective features, such as performance and charges, some funds are more competitive than others.

Patrick Norwood is insight analyst at Defaqto

Recommended

Boulding-Adrian-2012-700x450.jpg

Adrian Boulding: Advisers should not feel threatened by default drawdown

The work and pensions committee’s recent recommendation that drawdown providers offer a 0.75 per cent charging ‘default decumulation pathway’ by April 2019 has hit the headlines. The idea is that it will protect disengaged customers who may make poor investment and decumulation choices. Either trustees or independent governance committees would choose both a default fund […]

Warehouse workers portrait in work overalls. Workplace pensions article

What does value for money in a DC default look like?

Lorna Blyth – Head of Investment Solutions The phrase ‘value for money’ is fast becoming a favourite phrase of the pensions industry. The regulator sees ‘value for money’ as a key outcome for workplace pension members and as a result both providers and Independent Governance Committees (IGCs) are keen to evidence it. But what is it […]

Manufacturing-Plant-Factory-Industrial-700x450.jpg

Pensions Regulator: We could have done more on British Steel transfers

The Pensions Regulator admits it could have done more to help British Steel Pension Scheme members understand the consequences of transferring out into defined contribution plans. In its response to the work and pensions select committee’s report into British Steel published today the regulator reflects on what it has learned from the saga. TPR says […]

Selecting a wrapper

In the past, some advisers have avoided the use of onshore investment bonds, and some still do. The image of bonds may have been tarnished in the past, however, the days of high allocations and commissions are gone. It is important to put these factors aside and look objectively at the benefits onshore bonds can […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment