The House of Lords has delayed unveiling the new regulatory regime for claim management firms in a bid to strengthen the Compensation Bill.In a meeting of the grand committee this week Lord Hunt of Wirral moved to close any loopholes. He firmed up the need for transitional arrangements to regulate claim management firms with immediate effect once the Compensation Bill is passed. The Claims Standards Council, the voluntary watchdog for the sector, is widely tipped to become the regulator when the bill is passed. But CSC policy director Andy Wigmore believes the regulator is more likely to be a hybrid of stakeholders, including the FSA, the Office of Fair Trading and the Law Society. Wigmore says: “This regu- lation will be quite cataclysmic for firms that do not comply with the rules.” Possible Alternative Funding Models1: No case fees and 100 per cent levy Pros Consr Certainty of cost for the year ahead r Firms may dump cases and use the ombudsman r Remove worry from firm of consumer pursuing service as a cheap way to outsource complaints complaint with no merit to the ombudsman r Increased case numbers – caused by dumping of service cases on ombudsman – would mean that the levy r It could be viewed that spreading the costs would have to increase in subsequent yearsamong all IFAs in the form of a levy operated r Removal of flexible budget structure may resultlike an insurance policy for case fees and in needing to re-levy within the financial yearsmoothed incomer Firms may be more likely to refer consumersin a timely manner to the Financial OmbudsmanService in accordance with FSA rules2: Case fees payable depending on outcome (for example, firm “wins” = no case fee, firm “loses = case fee payable) Pros Consr “Polluter pays” model – only firms found r Cases “lost” would result in much higher feesto be “in the wrong” pay. (to cover cost of all other cases) r Incentive for firm to investigate complaints r Erosion of impartiality – firms may feel the and try to resolve them directly with consumer ombudsman had a vested interest in finding r Some firms unhappy that, even when a firm against the firm to get extra funding”wins” a case, they still get penalised by being r The majority of cases that go to ombudsman charged a case fee are not a simple “win”/”lose”. It would add considerably to the cost of the process if firms went on to dispute whether they had lost the case or notr It may mean that firms are more reluctant to refer cases to the Financial Ombudsman Service and therefore breach FSA rules3: IFA-related ombudsman costs subsidised by product providers No provision under current rules for cross-subsidies between different industry sectorsWhat do life offices think?
If 2005 was the year of regulation, then 2006 will surely be the year of enforcement. Let us hope so. Initially opposed to mortgage regulation, I still maintain that the MCCB was doing a perfectly good job. The endowment misselling phenomenon wrought regulatory overkill, wherein the then regulator’s own culpability on unrealistic illustrative growth rates went unaccounted for.
What conclusion should we be drawing from the events in the high street as last year drew to a close? The fact that both Next and Marks & Spencer were able to report a more cheering festive season is remarkable. Popular wisdom had it that they took business from each other but it seems that Christmas present-buying still takes people into these shops.
Mr R Bullivant, Chartered Insurance Institute In the PFS Newsletter, you have asked for feedback from members. Thank you for your letter of October 2005 inviting me to apply for the chartered financial planner title. This should be a moment when I should be proud to do just that but I feel compelled to write […]
The vast majority of Unipass users say the digital certificates increase their daily product- ivity and make financial websites easier to use, according to Origo’s annual survey. The research, involving almost 5,000 advisers, shows 78 per cent of users say it increases their daily productivity while 86 per cent agree that it makes financial websites […]
Read more 9amFinancial advisers and solicitors working together Presented by Ian Muirhead, director & chairman at Solicitors for Impartial Advice (SIFA) Listen to Ian’s expert insight and experiences of how financial advisers and solicitors can work together to deliver mutual benefit and enhanced client outcomes. Register here 10am Financial advisers and accountants working together Presented […]
- Top trends
News and expert analysis straight to your inboxSign up
Latest from Money Marketing
Sesame must compensate a client who complained she was missold a personal pension by one of the network’s former appointed representatives. According to a Financial Ombudsman Service decision, in 2002, Mrs P met with an adviser of a business that was at the time an appointed representative of Sesame. Following this meeting Mrs P agreed […]
Financial advisers need to engage in less systematic risk tolerance testing to position clients for high investment returns, according to risk profiling firm Oxford Risk. Speaking at a FinaMetrica/miPlanPlus event today, Oxford Risk head of behavioural finance Greg Davies says suitability across the industry is “rife with poor practice”. Davies says the most common adviser […]
The FCA is attempting to ban the boss of a debt management firm for allegedly using client money to purchase the business. Darren Lee Newton purchased First Step from former director Christine Whitehurst in 2013. The FCA argues he funded the deal through client money rather than out of his own pocket. Newton allowed more […]