I have held the view for many years that the only way we can re-establish the professional reputation of financial advice and planning is by a body where practitioners take ownership of standards of knowledge, skill and conduct. Ground lost in the 1980s to regulators must be retaken if the profession is to be anything more than a group of people at the mercy of being “found out” by those who would make political capital out of highlighting sector failures.Unfortunately, many people in the profession and outside it are domin-ated by a legacy of past mistakes. Some would seek to pretend there is nothing more to be done – everything is perfect. Others try to present the financial advice and planning profession as unredeemable unless it marches to their tune and is subject to even more controls, not only by regulators, but by appointed consumer representatives. I believe there is a great deal of merit in introducing public interest represent-ation into the standard-raising process but it is for the profession itself, after taking note of arguments by others, to raise its own standards. The trade papers bear testimony to the suspicion directed at anyone who wants to make a difference. It is important to note that the critics are only a minority and the vast majority of advisers are supportive of a professional approach. The critics will seize on supposed negative perceptions about organisations, individuals or suggested practices to try to defeat prop-osals for change. Another, perhaps more subtle anti-change approach, is to accept the general principle but then to raise a series of objections which virtually deadlock any attempt to move forward – in other words, to rely on inertia to preserve the status quo. I know there are advocates of a rearguard action against the Personal Finance Society and, by implication its parent the Chartered Insurance Institute, by persuading members to refuse to pay their fees. This seems an act of desperation and to leave out of account the clear need for advisers to raise their public reputation through creating a professional body where the majority of practitioners are members and which stands for integrity, responsibility and fair treatment of customers. Become involved with your professional body and try to change it in ways which are consistent with its high-level objectives but to refuse to have anything to do with it is to continue to allow the critics to have ownership of the debate and the reputation of advisers. What I would like to see in the pages of our trade newspapers is a proper, balanced debate. What we seem to get is a one-sided picture dominated by diatribes and angry assertions. A bit more thought and less emotion would help us to thrash out the issues in a more constructive way. Is there anyone out there who agrees with this? Why don’t you write a reasoned letter, for or against, but setting your comments against the background of the professional body and reputational issues I have set out above?
Syndicate Asset Management – a strategic investment company seeking to build a fund management firm by consolidating smaller fund managers – is seeking an Aim listing after raising 33m in pre-IPO financing.
Many clients, particularly unsophisticated investors, are nervous about investing offshore, believing it is the province of the super-rich or is inherently unsafe.
Halifax has been accused of trying to poach clients by financial adviser Keith Miles. The Monmouthshire Financial Services sole trader has accused Halifax of “thinking it is above the law” because it continued to contact his clients after being told not to do so. The Burns-Anderson member says he submitted online mortgage applications for clients […]
Financial services training firm Professional Development Partnership is running a range of workshops to boost exam success rates. The workshops – to be held around the UK – run from October 4-13. Each workshop is designed to complement self-study and reinforce and consolidate learning. Delegates can participate in an interactive revision workshop. Subjects covered include […]
Artemis European Opportunities Fund manager Mark Page is questioned about the merits of investing in Spanish supermarket group, Dia. Dia is a 7,000-store Spanish discount supermarket chain. But with cheaper food prices coming on to the market and an improving Spanish economy, journalist Alexis Xydias questions Mark about its inclusion in the Artemis European Opportunities […]
- Top trends
News and expert analysis straight to your inboxSign up
Latest from Money Marketing
There is no chance the FCA will let the issue rest but any policy decisions need to be informed by facts, not rhetoric
Robo-adviser Scalable Capital has moved into offering full financial advice. The Europe-wide firm will charge a fixed £200 fee if an investor decides to progress beyond an initial free session. According to Scalable Capital’s website the advice session can either take place over the phone or in person, and investors will get a full suitability […]
Typical transfer values for defined benefit scheme members remained high during 2017, ending the year at £236,000, according to Xafinity’s latest date. This was little changed from the end of 2016 when the figure was £234,000 the Xafinity Transfer Value Index shows. However there was some volatility over the year as the difference between the […]