View more on these topics

DB transfers drive FSCS levies up again

Pension savings-2015Advice firms behind the British Steel pension saga have contributed to driving Financial Services Compensation Scheme bills upwards for the coming year.

In a note this morning, the FSCS says it is having to levy £71m more than it forecast for 2018/19, including an extra £52m on life and pensions advisers.

The lifeboat fund says the main reason it has had to hike fees is due to impending claims over defined benefit pension transfers, often ending up in “illiquid and risky unregulated products”.

A pot of £10m has been put aside over IFAs including Active Wealth, one of the firms at the centre of claims over misselling Sipps to British Steel workers.

However, since levies on life and pensions advisers are capped at £75m, the surplus £64m needed will be paid by other parts of the industry.

Compensation over Sipp operators themselves is also putting pressure on the scheme. An additional £18m bill for investment providers has arisen “almost entirely” from claims against Sipp operators, the FSCS notes.

Investment advisers, however, will see a £4m decrease in planned levies as the FSCS continues to make recoveries from collapsed firms to try and offset expected compensation against the likes of Beaufort Securities.

FSCS chief executive Mark Neale says: “Risks rise as people make increasingly complex choices about the investment of their pension pots, even where investors take the sensible step of taking independent professional advice.”



Providers to pay a quarter of advisers’ FSCS bills

Providers will have to contribute 25 per cent of advisers’ Financial Services Compensation Scheme bills, the FCA has ruled today. Despite fierce opposition from some providers, and some advisers arguing that providers should pay up to 50 or 75 per cent in response to the FCA’s consultation, the regulator has decided to go ahead with […]

FSCS Interior 480

FSCS to pay back 2,700 clients of collapsed DFM Beaufort

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme will automatically compensate hundreds of clients of a collapsed discretionary fund manager, but other investors will have to wait another five months to get their money back. London-based Beaufort Securities has been investigated by both the FCA and US authorities. An indictment from the US Department of Justice alleges that […]


FSCS default list published as British Steel IFA and ‘fraudulent’ DFM in spotlight

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme has released the full list of firms it declared in default in March, including an advice firm facing allegations of unsuitable British Steel pension transfers and a discretionary fund manager being investigated by US authorities. Active Wealth and Beaufort Securities are two of 11 financial firms on the FSCS’ list. […]

Industry failing to nudge people to consider pensions options

The financial services industry has failed to find ways of nudging consumers to think about their options at retirement, despite three years of pension freedoms. A panel at the Association of British Insurers retirement conference today lamented the way companies talk to people about pensions and the lack of engagement it inspires. ABI director general […]

Leading Edge – April 2017

There is little doubt 2017 will be a year of political uncertainty. Leading Edge is Royal London Asset Management’s regular review of investment markets. This edition explores some of the impacts that this uncertainty is having on investors, from the pitfalls of prediction within UK equity investing to the dangers of opting for convenience over […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Martin Martin 1st May 2018 at 11:37 am

    So, although I have no say or control over who does what in an area that I won’t touch because of the risks involved, I must pay up? The levies would be much more reasonable if the FCA had any hint of control over what is going on.

    My latest theory is that the FCA would be a much better and more effective organisation if their numbers were halved overnight. They’d have to scrap all of the meaningless stuff and re-focus on what matters. Maybe that’s not as daft as it sounds.

  2. Is the cause individuals who were advised to transfer out of their Defined Benefit scheme or, in fact, the underlying assets held in a pension which was ceded from a defined benefit scheme?

    Two very different issues.

Leave a comment