DB transfer showstoppers

Transfers from defined benefit (DB) schemes are a bit of a hot topic just now. In this article we look at a couple of factors that could prevent a transfer from happening

By Jim Grant, Senior Product Insight & Technical Support Analyst

Equalisation of pensions

Prior to the Barber case in 1990, DB pension schemes typically provided pensions at age 60 for women and age 65 for men.  After Barber, schemes had to change their rules so that benefits were paid at the same age for men and women. They could be equalised at the higher age or any age between the two ages but, until a pension scheme got around to changing its rules, they were deemed to be equalised at the lower age.

The scheme rules will state the legal process by which the rules can be changed. So, if the proper process isn’t followed, it could be that the scheme thinks it’s equalised at, say, age 65, when in fact it could be that the lower age applies.

Most providers therefore need confirmation that benefits in the scheme have been equalised before the transfer can go ahead, otherwise the transfer value may not reflect the correct value of the benefits.

Usually it’s a formality but sometimes the ceding scheme isn’t able to provide the necessary confirmation and the transfer can’t go ahead.

Guaranteed minimum pension (GMP)

DB schemes that were contracted-out before 1997 have to provide a GMP roughly equivalent to the earnings-related state pension the member would have received if they’d stayed in the state scheme.

This runs alongside the scheme pension and, at age 60 for women or 65 for men, the higher of the two pensions has to be paid.

In a transfer, the cost of the GMP at the relevant age has to be covered by that part of the transfer value monies that can be used for this purpose. Often it’s not, because the cost doesn’t actually have to be met until age 60/65.

Post-1997 funds (when GMP stopped accruing) and additional voluntary contributions (AVCs) can’t be used to cover the GMP cost.

If the GMP cost isn’t covered the transfer can’t happen, so a receiving scheme needs confirmation that the GMP cost at 60/65 is covered now by that part of the transfer value that can be used to cover it (also known as the reserved amount).

So, just because the total transfer value is higher than the GMP cost at age 60/65, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the reserved amount is high enough.

If the cost isn’t covered the transfer can’t go ahead unless the ceding scheme is willing to increase the transfer value to the point that it is covered.

Recommended

Slipping through the cracks 620x430.jpg

Phoenix lines up job cuts after Axa acquisition

Phoenix is set to shed roles in a redundancy round following its decision to buy parts of Axa’s business last year. The closed-book provider snapped up Axa Wealth businesses Embassy, its off-platform investment and pension division and Sun Life, its direct protection business, in a deal signed last May, before also buying rival closed-book operation […]

Investment Association criticised over pay register role

The UK’s main shareholder rights group has criticised the Government for appointing the Investment Association to oversee its executive pay register. The register is the brainchild of business secretary Greg Clark and will force all listed firms to show the pay gap between executives and workers. The public register would also list firms that face […]

Aviva Investors manager heads for T. Rowe Price

Nick Samouilhan is to join T. Rowe Price as a solutions strategist in the firm’s EMEA multi-asset solutions team following the announcement of his departure from Aviva Investors yesterday. Samouilhan spent seven years at Aviva where he co-managed the £2.4bn Multi Strategy Target Income fund and the risk-targeted multi-asset funds having begun his fund management career […]

Tapering of annual allowance – adjusted and threshold income

The definitions of adjusted income and threshold income used to determine whether, and to what extent, someone’s annual allowance will be reduced can be confusing.  Here we try to make sense of it all. The annual allowance will be reduced for high income individuals from 6 April 2016.  Our previous article Tapering of annual allowance […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment