View more on these topics

DB pension transfers block advisers’ PI renewal

Piggy-Bank-Savings-UK-700x450.jpg

Exposure to risks created by advising on pension transfers is the second most common reason professional indemnity insurance will not offer renewals.

A survey of six of the biggest PI firms serving the adviser market conducted by Protean Risk reveals the reasons insurers will not offer renewals to existing clients.

This includes issues such as poor claims records, change of business models, and non-disclosure of material information.

The report says: “It is clear from the results that insurers remain concerned about claims frequency, with more than two thirds of those surveyed expecting claim notifications to increase in the next 12 months.

“When considering the top three concerns, perhaps unsurprisingly, the majority of respondents focused on pension transfers (especially defined benefit), tax schemes, and unregulated collective investment schemes with insistent clients emerging as a key underwriting factor in each of these areas.”

Insistent client pension transfers remain a contentious issue for advisers.

The FCA says it will not issue further guidance, but advisers and the Personal Finance Society say the regulator is failing to recognise the role of PI insurers.

Protean Rick chief executive Nathan Sewell says: “We wanted to help IFAs understand how they can better protect their business from professional indemnity claims, make more informed risk management investment decisions and secure the most competitive insurance premiums.”

Recommended

FCA interior logo 620x430
9

FCA splashes £157k on plants and catering

The FCA spent more than £27,000 on plants and £133,000 on catering across its London and Edinburgh offices in the 12 months ended 31 March 2016. According to a Freedom of Information Act request submitted by Money Marketing, the regulator did not purchase any plants but paid £23,114 to a contracted supplier that provides and […]

Leading Edge – April 2017

There is little doubt 2017 will be a year of political uncertainty. Leading Edge is Royal London Asset Management’s regular review of investment markets. This edition explores some of the impacts that this uncertainty is having on investors, from the pitfalls of prediction within UK equity investing to the dangers of opting for convenience over […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Julian Stevens 15th June 2016 at 1:13 pm

    Self protection is impossible ~ if things don’t work out as hoped, the client will complain, lie, refer to the FOS and the FOS will declare any signed waiver of liability to be invalid. Anyone facilitating a transfer out of a DB scheme ~ or indeed just about ANYTHING ~ on an insistent client basis, contrary to advice, must need their head seeing to.

Leave a comment