View more on these topics

Danby Bloch: How advisers can avoid tax evasion penalties

Businesses found guilty could face unlimited financial penalties and many other unpleasant consequences.

Helm Godfrey chairman Danby Bloch Under a new law, advice firms could be guilty of a criminal offence if an employee or other associated person facilitates someone’s tax evasion.

The management of the business might not have been involved in the activities themselves – indeed, they might not have even been aware of them – but they could still be found guilty.

The new law in question is the Criminal Finances Act, which received Royal Assent just before the election. The act could well come into force in the autumn, although it may be a few weeks before we know for sure. Businesses have a defence if they have “reasonable prevention procedures”, so there is still time to take action.

When is evasion not evasion?

To be clear, it is criminal tax evasion being covered here; not tax avoidance. The key is intention. Broadly speaking, a person evades tax if they know they have a liability and dishonestly intends not to declare it.

Carelessness or making a mistake does not usually constitute tax evasion, nor does using a tax avoidance scheme – usually.

Likewise, the employee or associate of the business who facilitates the evasion must have criminal intent and know what they are doing.

As HM Revenue & Customs says in its draft guidance: “The new offence… does not radically alter what is criminal, it simply focuses on who is held to account for acts contrary to the current criminal law.”

‘IFAs as enablers’: How HMRC will target advisers behind tax avoidance schemes

And it is not just UK tax evasion that counts. There are two separate offences – one relating to UK tax and the other to overseas tax.

Where UK tax is involved, the UK offence can be committed by any company or partnership, regardless of where it has been set up or where it operates. If it concerns the evasion of non-UK tax, then the business will commit an offence if the facilitation of the evasion involves a company or partnership resident in UK or with a place of business here.

Overseas evasion for this purpose must be an offence in the other relevant jurisdiction and must also amount to behaviour that would be regarded as dishonest by a UK court.

As well as employees, agents and other people and organisations who work for or represent a business can be implicated. But some good news is that any assistance an employee or associate facilitates must be in their business role; not as just a private individual.

Preparation and principles

So how can a business prepare for this? After all, remember an offence may take place even if the management has no idea of what has been going on.

Fortunately, there is a defence if a business can prove it had established procedures to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion. Alternatively, they should be able to argue it would have been reasonable to expect procedures to have been put in place.

HMRC’s draft guidance sets out six principles for businesses to consider in setting up their prevention procedures. These are as follows:

1. Risk assessment

Businesses should carry out risk assessments. They should aim to identify the risks in their organisations and any gaps in their controls. People running businesses need to understand the extent to which their employees and associates have the motives, opportunities and means to facilitate evasion of one sort or another. Where these exist, businesses need to consider how to manage the situation.

It is all rather like the process that businesses should have gone through for the Bribery Act. And obviously it needs to be recorded adequately. As always: if you did not write it down, it did not happen.

2. Proportionality

HMRC’s guidance accepts there are some very low-risk businesses where the risk assessment might be the end of the process. However, it seems highly unlikely an advice business would come into this category. Almost certainly very few are involved in such shenanigans but the opportunities are there for advisers.

3. Top level commitment

The board and senior management need to understand and be prepared to act on countering their exposure to the new offences with new procedures and monitoring.

4. Due diligence

Businesses will need to make sure they carry out due diligence on their existing associates and potential business partners’ organisations with which they work.

5. Communication (including training)

HMRC says: “A clear articulation of an organisation’s policy against engaging in activities to help clients commit tax fraud deters those providing services on behalf of the relevant body from engaging in such activities.”

Training of all staff will also be a high priority but, as with all activities, it should be proportionate to the risk the business faces.

6. Monitoring and review

This should not be a one-off exercise. Businesses should monitor and review their procedures and make improvements to them as necessary.

Action plan

So the first step should be to carry out a risk assessment. In particular, which advisers or other employees or associates could be a risk? What areas are higher risk than others? Businesses may have more scope than individual private investors, and expatriates and non-doms could have more opportunities for tax evasion than UK clients. Remember that evading non-UK tax is also caught under the act.

And what might be the tell-tale signs of something going amiss? These could include inconsistent fact-finding information about a client or group of clients, a sudden increase in higher risk business and any of the signs that would also lead one to suspect money laundering.

You have been warned. Businesses found guilty could face unlimited financial penalties and many other unpleasant consequences.

Danby Bloch is chairman at Helm Godfrey



Fines for tax avoidance enablers to raise over £100m

The Government expects the tax take from penalties imposed on tax avoidance “enablers” to reach £115m by 2021/22, Budget documents show. In the spring Budget announcement today, Chancellor Philip Hammond reaffirmed that professionals who enable a tax avoidance arrangement that is later defeated by HMRC will be subject to financial penalties from July. In a […]


SJP under fire again over charges and exit fees

Clients of St James’s Place have attacked the firm over what they say is an opaque charging structure and punitive levels of exit fees. The Sunday Times was asked to examine what retired solicitor Arnold Rosen had been charged by SJP between 2009 and 2015 after Rosen could not work out the level of charges […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment