View more on these topics

Danby Bloch: Time for new advice standards on retirement income

Drawdown involves many more risk factors than accumulation or steady state  

Bloch-Danby-2014-MM-700.jpg

Portfolio design for income in retirement is very different from most other scenarios and it is time to start setting new advice standards, procedures and rules. The starting point should be to think about clients’ objectives and the risks they face.

Defining clients’ objectives is difficult and needs a lot of talking through. Partly this is because many people have only the vaguest idea about how much they aim to spend at different points in their retirement. In any case, spending and income are closely aligned: most people tend to adjust their expenditure to their available income. Meanwhile, there are lots of unknowns about the future, such as health, availability of work, inflation and family needs.

Cashflow projections 

It is hard to understand how advisers can help clients plan their retirement income and expenditure without some kind of cashflow projections. Precision should not be mistaken for accuracy in making cashflow forecasts. It is usually good enough to make estimates of very broad categories of expenditure based on current and planned patterns. However, it is crucial to look at several different scenarios to understand the consequences of major changes in income/withdrawal levels that could occur.

Drawdown involves more risks than accumulation or steady state. The normal investment risks are amplified by the process of taking withdrawals above the level of a portfolio’s natural income.

Sequencing risk means an early loss has a greater impact than a much later equivalent loss on a client’s capacity to take withdrawals. Try modelling a 20 per cent loss in the first couple of years of a portfolio taking withdrawals of 7 per cent a year and a natural annual income of just 2 per cent. Run the same figures but assume the loss happens after 10 or 15 years. The difference is enormous.

Then there is reverse pound cost averaging or “pound cost ravaging”. In drawdown, the investor sells more units when their value is low and fewer when their value is high, adversely exaggerating the effects of volatility.

Advisers also need to consider how long the client will need to have income. Some long-term cashflow projections take the target lifespan as life expectancy at the starting age. That might be 20 years for a 65-year-old man, according to the Pru. 

But this is just the average. Roughly half of all 65-year-old men will live longer and quite a few will be centenarians. Perhaps advisers should plan more conservatively for a healthy client? If the client has dependants who are younger, the timescale might be even longer.

Inviting annuity 

As time goes on, some kind of longevity insurance in the form of an annuity looks more and more inviting, especially if the rate of income withdrawals is expected to exceed the natural income of the portfolio by a significant proportion.

This brings us back to how much a client could afford to lose. One conclusion might be that a client’s spendable income needs to be reasonably predictable – at least in the immediate future. A client might be able to adjust to a much lower standard of living, with enough warning if the capital value of their investments fell drastically.

A related conclusion might be that portfolios of equities and similar investments tend to recover eventually but this might take several years.

All of which drives one to conclude that retirement portfolios, where the client needs to draw capital, should consist of broadly two pools of assets. A safe pool would consist of cash and/or short-dated bonds, which would provide the certainty of resources for the immediate future. The second pool would generate growth (with risk) and consist of equities, perhaps some property and longer-term bonds.

The bigger the safe pool, the longer the client could survive a downturn but this would be at the expense of overall potential growth and inflation protection.

For example, a client expecting £30,000 a year from their portfolio might decide to retain about three years of income in their safe pool. The remainder might be in a longer-term portfolio of equities and longer-term bonds. A client with a high tolerance and capacity for risk would consider the reverse.

In some respects, this approach is just a mental accounting exercise, compartmentalising a conventional mixed portfolio. It will not suit everyone but it has the advantage of translating the realities of risk into a structure and language most clients can understand.

Danby Bloch is editorial director of Taxbriefs Financial Publishing

Pensions flexibility: the new rules – keep your clients up-to-date

Keep your clients up to date with a personalised guide to the new rules and proposals first announced in the Budget affecting retirement income. The latest edition to our Key Guides series covers:

  • Revisions that took effect from 27 March.
  • Total drawdown flexibility that should be available from April 2015.
  • The Chancellor’s announcement on the flat tax rate on death benefits
  • New Class 3A NICs.
  • Likely increases to the minimum pension age.
  • Reductions on death benefits for some individuals.

To find out more call Dave Posnett on 020 7970 4142

Recommended

Investment principles and risk

CPD: Investment principles and risk

The latest edition of Newsbrief counts as 1 hour of structured CPD and covers the regulatory and marketplace changes that took place during October 2014. Visit the Money Marketing CPD Centre to answer 10 multiple choice questions and complete this CPD activity. Just click into your CPD Plan and you’ll find each month’s marketplace changes round-up in your activity list.

Big-Ben-UK-Gates-London-Moody-700.jpg

UK faces deeper cuts to Govt spending

The UK faces deeper cuts after 2015 as the annual savings needed to meet the Government’s austerity programme are set to almost double to £48bn. Analysis by the Financial Times shows despite claims by Prime Minister David Cameron that most of the cuts to public services have been achieved, less than half the necessary reductions […]

Friends-Life-Office-Interior-700x450.jpg
1

Friends Life sales surge despite Budget annuities hit

Friends Life’s UK division saw sales increase 11 per cent in the nine months to September 2014 despite the Budget reforms hitting retirement income new business. The provider’s interim management statement, published this morning, reveals sales rose from £521m in the first nine months of 2013 to £579m this year. This was driven by a […]

Identifying best-in-class UK stocks — Mark Martin, Neptune UK Opportunities Fund

FE Alpha Manager Mark Martin assumed management of the multi-cap UK Opportunities Fund at the beginning of February. As manager of the highly regarded UK Mid Cap Fund, Martin has begun restructuring the new portfolio to focus on our very best UK stock ideas from across the FTSE All-Share Index. In this video, update Martin addresses:

– Themes informing the UK Opportunities Fund
– The multi-cap structure of the fund
– UK equity valuations

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I totally agree that there is a need to spend time with clients drilling down to the best solution for them, there is no way of simplifying what is a big decision for many people, where advisers can demonstrate their value. My view, based on personal experience, is that a large number of advisers will not have the skills or technical knowledge to go into the level of detail required, so formal guidance or procedures could be of benefit.

    Cashflow analysis, whether structured or informal, sets out the income framework, and makes it easier to see whether the asset base will match the objectives over the long term, after making allowances for the “unknowns” For simplicity I call the pots short, medium and long money, ensuring that the portfolio is resistant to short term fluctuations. Once clients understand the concept, they are able to accept that using their own cash savings for short term income can be efficient, as can taking profits in high markets.

    The big question, rarely asked, is how much can you afford to lose? For me that is the starting point, then the retirement income strategy can be explained, often that will change the client perception of risk and capacity for loss, as decumulation takes place over a long period of time. For some it will confirm the need to purchase an annuity or set up a dual strategy, having secured their basic income needs with the annuity and topping up from other assets.

    Danby is right to highlight the need for higher advice standards, flogging ready made products is not always the answer in what is an ever changing world.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com