View more on these topics

Daft proposal for remuneration

Open letter to FSA chairman Howard Davies

According to the March 1 edition of Money Marketing, the FSA has recently issued regulatory guidance concerning the remuneration of IFAs, where a product provider is offering admin support in respect of decision trees.

My understanding of the FSA proposals is that where an individual prospective investor is lead through a decision tree by an employee of the insurance company, rather than the IFA, then the FSA will not permit that product provider to subsequently remunerate the IFA for introducing this client to them.

My understanding is that the FSA stance on this is driven by the indirect benefit rules.

If this situation is indeed as outlined above, then may I respectfully urge you to reconsider your position in this matter. This proposed restriction would be anti-competitive, an unwarranted and arbitrary intrusion on the relationship between product providers and independent intermediaries and, most importantly, it would undoubtedly impede the free distribution of stakeholder pensions.

Independent financial advisers and product providers exist in a close mutually dependent relationship. IFAs introduce clients to product providers, who in turn provide a range of services and facilities to the clients of IFAs as well as paying remuneration to the IFAs if requested so to do in recognition of the new business introduction by the IFA.

Clearly, it is impossible to regulate precisely every single aspect of the relationship between product providers and IFAs. For example, product providers provide investment services, application forms and online information.

They also provide the client with a lot of information concerning taxation and legislation.

It has already been acknowledged that the so-called tree-walking process is not a regulated sales activity. As such, it is no different to any of the other provider-to-client interactions which may be subject to overall regulatory control but which of themselves should not be subject to specific regulatory constraint.

To impose such regulatory constraint will inhibit the functioning of the free market and is an unnecessary intrusion upon product providers&#39 ability to distinguish their own individual proposition by virtue of the added value services that they can provide to intermediaries.

Stakeholder schemes can be set up on a variety of bases, as individual or group arrangements, through an employer or directly with a member, on a commission or a fee-charging basis and with the fee being charged either to the employer to an individual.

In all these cases, the IFA is contracted by the client to provide a service to them. The FSA appears to be suggesting that, where individual members of a group have taken advantage of a tree-walking helpline, then the intermediary will have to go back and renegotiate the terms of his fees with the client.

This does not appear to be in anybody&#39s interests as such a position would exclude many smaller IFAs from the stakeholder market altogether, thereby reducing distribution outlets and inhibiting take-up. Is this what the Government wants?

I am at a loss to understand the logic behind your proposals, which do not appear to deliver any benefit to anyone at all. Basically, the whole idea is daft. Please drop it.

Thomas McPhail Pensions development manager

Torquil Clark,

Wolverhampton

Recommended

Treasury rethink on journalist rules

The Treasury is reviewing its plans laid out last week to force financial journalists to disclose share interests in firms which they write about in articles. It said there would be a debate on proposals in Article 20 of the Financial Promotions Order obliging journalists to put in print any financial interests held in a […]

Henderson distributes best of the best

Henderson Global Investors is expanding its fund of funds range with the introduction of the independent distribution portfolio trust.This fund of funds is one of three recent additions to the Henderson range. It is different from the other funds in that it is concerned purely with income and is designed for those with a lower […]

UK public don&#39t understand Isas

An overwhelming majority of people in the UK do not know what an Isa is or what the initials stand for, according to research by Self Trade UK. The survey by the online share trader showed 83 per cent of survey respondents did not know what an Isa was, with some suggesting Investment Savings Annuity, […]

Keeping it in the family

This Budget is generally good news for families. This should see a flow of funds that have the potential to be invested in long-term savings, particularly pensions, which is good news in the run-up to stakeholder. The extension of the Isa limit also gives consumers assurance for their savings. The removal of the minimum funding […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com