View more on these topics

Critical faculty

After almost four years of hard graft, frustration and grief my critical-illness knowledge base, CIExpert, is finally up and running.

The concept was established in 2008 when it became apparent to me that despite being able to compare the differences between competing claim definitions, I was unable to allocate a true value because the actual condition incidence figures were unknown.

By this I do not mean the headline figures such as, 260,000 new diagnoses a year. This only tells us that it is a major health concern, it does not provide any real guidance to potential CI claims.

Incidence statistics inform us of the numbers of diagnoses and curative techniques for any given year and this is the type of information that providers and reinsurers use to price their products. Naturally, advisers should also be aware of this information but it is devilishly hard work to unearth it and then contextualise it for CI purposes.

Additionally, there are trends developing which hint at deviations to future claims experiences. Malignant melanoma, prostate and liver cancers are all increasing whereas stomach, lung and bladder cancers have shown a marked decrease.

Some have commented on CI plans being easy to value, that because 85 per cent of claims come from five conditions then the product is commoditised.

This is palpably untrue because even with the five prime conditions – cancer, heart attack, stroke, multiple sclerosis and benign brain tumour – there are significant variations.

A prime example is loss of limbs. Some providers insist on loss of two limbs whereas others on only one limb. Statistically, there is a 14 times greater prospect of losing one limb than two. An important consideration for what is, admittedly, a relatively minor condition.

CIExpert provides information for consumers as well as a wealth of information for advisers. This includes rating competing plans for different age groups, gender and smoker status as well as providing access to a library of historic plans going as far back as 1991.

Additionally, there is a detailed analysis of every condition with the ability to print off a report showing how a plan selection has been arrived at.

Strangely, there has been no real focus on the differences between current and historic CI plans but, believe me, most of the pre-2002 policies offer more scope for a successful claim than the current versions, particularly for men.

Back in April 2009, FSA research concluded that 68 per cent of policy owners believed their plan paid out if they were unable to work. These figures, even if slightly inaccurate, demonstrate the complexity of these plans to Joe Public, a description that may extend to some advisers, particularly those about to put their toes in the protection water after the RDR.

As an industry, we need to increase the size of the cake instead of endlessly resegmenting it. Such a task may well be the only positive benefit that stems from the RDR depredations and we all need to make the most of the opportunity to simultaneously reduce the protection gap and offer the correct advice.

Alan Lakey is partner at Highclere Financial Services



Restricted row over Aviva 75% claim

Industry experts are divided over the efficiencies and cost savings for clients that can be achieved through offering a restricted advice service rather than an independent one. Last week, Aviva predicted over 75 per cent of the market could end up restricted by 2015 and suggested advisers offering a restricted service could save up to […]

Tony Wickenden: Putting entrepreneurs’ relief in context

Last week, I looked at some of the fundamentals of entrepreneurs’ relief and the main qualifying conditions. This week, I would like to continue with a case study that might help to put some of those rules into context, especially in relation to the cumulative nature of the entrepreneurs’ relief limit. It is taken from […]

JP Morgan Cazenove capital markets chair resigns after FSA fine

JP Morgan Cazenove chairman of capital markets Ian Hannam has resigned after the FSA decided to fine him for market abuse. The regulator published the decision to fine Hannam £450,000 yesterday. The FSA says Hannam disclosed inside information in two emails sent in September and October 2008 to a prospective client. The emails contained inside […]


Call to fine firms who miss 2-week pension transfer deadline

The Government is facing calls to fine providers which take longer than two weeks to transfer pensions as industry opposition grows on fundamental small pot reform. In a Department for Work and Pensions consultation, entitled, Meeting Future Workplace Pension Challenges, which closed last month, policymakers put forward three possible options designed to help people consolidate […]

Leading Edge June – Investment panel debate

RLAM’s asset class specialists discuss some of the findings from the panel session at our recent Investment Conference. By Rob Williams, Head of Distribution Welcome to the latest edition of Leading Edge. It has been an eventful six months since the last e-zine. The European Central Bank announced ongoing stimulus measures, while the immigration crisis in Europe threw the […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm