View more on these topics

Court’s verdict rejects ombudsman case fee

A judge has ruled the Financial Ombudsman Service is wrong to charge advisers a case fee if a case is rejected in a move that could force a fundamental restructure of the organisation’s funding.

Judge Rutherford of Trowbridge County Court found the FOS’s practice of charging firms for the cost of dealing with complaints that are rejected to be “unfair in principle and in practice”. The story was revealed by

Judge Rutherford ruled that “no reasonable public body would maintain and enforce such a rule”. He dismissed the claim and ordered the FOS to pay costs of £2,812.

The ombudsman service brought the case against IFAs Brian and Dolly Pickering after they refused to pay four case fees of £360 each.

The FOS is appealing against the ruling but compliance consultant Adam Samuel says it may not secure an appeal date in the next 12 months as it was found to have wasted a May 2007 hearing date after failing to disclose documents in time.

FOS spokeswoman Emma Parker denies there will bean appeal delay and says the ruling does not alter the legal requirement on all other businesses to pay case fees. She says: “It touches on some wider issues about how we are funded so we will be appealing.”

Law firm Shakespeare Putsman partner Gareth Fatchett believes advisers should withhold case fees until the appeal. He says: “I would advise IFA firms who are being asked to pay the case fee to refuse and ask for the matter to be referred to court.”

The FOS also confirmed to Money Marketing this week that an average of only 10 cases a year out of 100,000 are considered frivolous or vexatious by the FOS, meaning the adviser escapes the fee. Parker says this is due in part to an initial screening process which weeds out 86 per cent of complaints.

Highclere Financial Services partner Alan Lakey says: “These victories are gradually turning back the clock to the pre-FSMA days when the various ombudsman bodies had to comply with law.”


How can we offer affordable advice?

Assuming we accept that IFAs are allowed to be remunerated for their services (I say assuming because quite patently there are some commentators who believe we should offer our services free of charge), then surely the issue is how can we as a profession offer affordable advice?

Darling of the messes

Napoleon Bonaparte was once asked what special qualities he looked for in his generals. He replied: “There is one great quality that all great men share and that is luck.” Chancellor Alistair Darling appears finally to have run out of luck.

OBSR suspends Franklin Templeton’s A rating

Old Broad Street Research has suspended Franklin Templeton’s A rating on its Europe fund following the departure of manager Andrew MacKirdy.MacKirdy, who also managed the global fund sicav, will be replaced on the European fund by Uwe Zoellner. OBSR research director Richard Romer-Lee says: “Following the news that Andrew MacKirdy has left Franklin Templeton, OBSR […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm