View more on these topics

Count the cost of charging

The impact of the RDR on the cost of advice and clients’ willingness to pay for advice is a key issue for any adviser business in the run up to January 1, 2013.

For businesses that have not previously used fees in a significant way, this means determining whether to charge per hour, per annum or for each piece of advice and what level to set the fees at. For other businesses, this will mean finetuning their fee offering or expanding it to cover all their pension and investment business and determining if their full client bank can tolerate fees at a level that makes financial sense for the IFA.

These changes are giving IFAs enough to deal with without the FSA stepping in with its size 12s to further stir up the issue with inaccurate and misleading claims.

In an update on the RDR on its website last week, the FSA outlined what the RDR will mean for consumers and how this will affect the provision of investment advice. Alongside explanations of the requirement for higher qualifications and the need for independent advice to be free from any distorting influence, such as commission and restricted product panels, the FSA has also addressed the subject of customer-agreed remuneration and this is where it runs into trouble.

Its explanation of CAR is fine but it says clearly: “These changes are not altering how much the advice should cost.”

The adviser-charging round table recently held by Money Marketing concluded that, for many clients, this is simply not true.

If fees are paid out of net income, rather than out of a tax-efficient product, there is a greater cost to the client. If advisers offer advice as a stand alone service, HMRC rules mean this will be subject to VAT, meaning an automatic 20 per cent increase in the cost of advice for the client.

Although some high-net-worth clients may see a reduction in the cost of their advice by moving from commission to an hourly or annual fee, when you add in additional business costs, such as attaining a higher standard of qualification and increased capital adequacy (both direct consequences of the RDR) the cost of advice is certain to increase for a majority of clients.

The FSA is not only forcing up the cost of advice but by disingenuously claiming this is nothing to do with the RDR, it leaves IFAs open to charges of greed and profiteering when they tell their clients that costs are going up.


Polin: 'Time to move on'

Polin quits Ignis

Ignis Asset Management sales and marketing director Jona-than Polin has quit after seven years at the firm. He will leave Ignis at the end of July and all sales and marketing activity will be overseen by Ignis chief executive Chris Samuel. Polin is known for setting up a number of boutique strategies at Ignis, such […]

Swiss Re buys Alico policies

Swiss Re has acquired 300,000 life insurance policies and £1.6bn of assets from Alico. It agreed the deal for an undisclosed sum last week via its business unit Admin Re, which acquires blocks of in-force life and health insurance business. Last November, MetLife bought AIG subsidiary Alico for £10.8bn. Swiss Re executive board member and […]


Tenet disputes FOS award increase

Tenet has challenged the increase to the Financial Ombudsman Service’s award limit from £100,000 to £150,000, citing it as a further example of where IFAs are treated differently to other professions. Tenet has criticised the FOS for operating under a system whereby a final decision cannot be appealed. The network also says that changes to […]

In Focus Ebola cover - thumbnail

White paper — In Focus: Ebola Virus Disease

Jelf Employee Benefits focuses on Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) and what this means for businesses with operations in West Africa. This will be of particular interest to those with employees either travelling to, or living within, West Africa, the area affected by the most catastrophic outbreak of Ebola to date.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. John Blackmore 10th June 2011 at 8:21 am

    The FSA is correct cost for most will not increase.
    The very small minority who really need Independent advice are wealthy and will negotiate fees down.

    The other 95% will either go to the Banks and or Direct.

    The ones who will really suffer are those Advisers datft enough to become RDR compliant only getting level 4 qualified and thinking that they can charge increased fees. Not enough of the public are daft enough to pay more for what will still be basic simple sales.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm