View more on these topics

Consumer&#39s View

Whatever the final outcome of the Consumers&#39 Association&#39s challenge to the life industry over the distribution of orphan assets, there are a number of issues concerning mutuality and with-profits which must be urgently considered.

Indeed, the important que stion needs to be asked – is the concept of mutuality, in particular, with-profits, no longer appropriate or a viable proposition?

Axa argued that it needs to retain most of Equity & Law&#39s orphan assets to meet its liabilities and, in the light of what has happened at Equit able Life, they may well be right.

The difficulty is in the calculations – actuaries have had a pretty poor track record of getting things right in recent years where with-profits funds are concerned.

There is no doubt that he who pays the piper calls the tune and that the actuaries came up with the figures Axa wanted them to produce.

Whoever the Equity & Law surpluses belong to, they do not belong to Axa, a proprietary company which acqui red them by taking over the mutual Equity & Law.

They belong to the current and past policyholders of Equity & Law. What Axa, and many other life companies, are doing is asset-stripping – very popular in the 70s and 80s when one company would take over another and raid the surpluses in the pension fund.

In many respects, the Lords&#39 judgment which bro ught Equitable Life to its knees is at odds with the Axa High Court decision.

The ruling stated that Equitable could not cut the terminal bonus to pension policyholders who held valuable guaranteed annuities, to take account
of the cost of the guarantee, but must give those policyholders the same terminal bonus as others who did not enjoy the benefit of the guarantee.

In other words, the management and the appointed actuary did not have discretion to distribute the profits in the fund as they saw fit.

This resulted in one of the biggest inequities of all time since with-profits endowment policyholders derive no benefit from the guarantees offered to the with-profits pension policyholders – yet they were for ced to pay for them thr ough reduced bonuses.

But if actuaries do not have discretion to use surpluses in the with-profits fund as they see fit, why should they be allowed to use with-profits surpluses to fund loss-leader promotion of stakeholder pensions?

Or expansion into other areas of dubiously profitable business?

Or to fund a multitude of other activities which are of no benefit to existing with-profits policyholders at all?

Yet this is what the Axa High Court judgment apparently endorses.

When Standard Life spent many millions trying to develop an institutional fund management business it did not consult policyholders.Nor did it have any credible explanation when asked how doing so would benefit existing policyholders.

The same applies to the considerable sums of money spent on setting up its Hong Kong operation – policyholders were not consulted.

Moreover, as the Consu mers&#39 Association has pointed out most forcefully in respect of the Prudential policyholders&#39 legal challenge concerning ownership of the Pru&#39s orphan assets: “The Pru was one of the biggest culprits in the huge pension misselling scandal, yet the Government and the regulators are allowing it to use the orphan assets to pay the vast bulk of its£2bn share of the compensation, rather than making its shareholders foot the bill.”

If the concept of mutuality is to mean anything, then the owners of mutuals, the policyholders, must have some say in the running of the company, including any distribution of orphan assets.

The Consumers&#39 Asso ciation points out that negotiations between Axa and the regulator took place over two years with no policyholder representation at all. This cannot be right.

The Consumers&#39 Asso ciation is therefore calling for a formal inq uiry to look at the concept of with-profits funds and to whom they belong.

Mutuality and sharing the benefits of with-profits funds must involve the policyholders. The life companies would argue that policyholders do not understand the concepts nor the thinking behind the actuaries&#39 considerations.

This is probably true. Quite clearly, neither do the regulators. But since this is the case, the time has prob ably come to admit that mut uality has had its day and to wind up the with-profits funds before the management blows it all on some other madcap scheme.

Recommended

Yorkshire Building Society – FTSE Linked Tessa Only Isa

Wednesday, 17th January 2001.Type: Cash Isa.Aim: Growth linked to FTSE 100 index.Minimum investment: £100.Maximum investment: £9,000.Catmarked: No.Investment choice: 100 per cent in cash.Yield: From April 1, 2001, half of the investment will receive 7 per cent gross a year, and half will receive 60 per cent of the growth in the FTSE 100 index over […]

Gauge value of guarantees

I have received letters from several of my insurers reminding me that my old personal pensions are maturing on my 60th birthday. As you know, I intend to carry on working for a short while. Can I ignore these letters as the last thing I require today is more income on which I will have […]

Find clicks with 77% boost

Financial website directory find.co.uk saw a 77 per cent increase in the numbers of hits it received in the last quarter of 2000 compared with the previous year. The directory says the total number of people clicking through from the Find site to linked finance product providers during the fourth quarter rose to 521,000 from […]

Standard & Poor&#39s to offer fund information online

Standard and Poor&#39s Fund Services have entered into an agreement with Yahoo! UK & Ireland, to allow investors access to its UK fund databases for free. Yahoo! UK & Ireland has incorporated S&PFS information within its financial and mutual funds section, including data on unit trusts, investment trusts, life and pension funds. S&PFS product development […]

Five reasons for optimism in India

By Kunal Desai, Head of Indian Equities at Neptune Investment Management Following the MSCI India Index’s 26.4 per cent return in 2014, stemming from a 7.3 per cent rise in GDP, investors have recently become increasingly concerned about India’s future growth potential. What has happened to India’s reform agenda and are there any signs of […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com