View more on these topics

Complaints about Sipps double

Complaints about Sipps almost doubled over the last year as the number of overall pension complaints from consumers rose by 10 per cent.

In its annual review published this week, The Pensions Advisory Service says overall complaints rose to 7,746 for the year ending March 2009 compared with 7,026 in the previous 12 months. It says the number of complaints and enquiries specifically relating to Sipps leapt to 1,024 from 540 in the previous year.

The biggest cause of the rise in overall complaints is poor administration with increases in delays and mistakes contributing heavily to the figures. The majority of the complaints concern individual pension plans.

TPAS says that a number of enquiries from people with Sipps reveals that some had clearly not understood the level of personal responsibility taken on, indicating that the product may not have been appropriate.

Chief executive Malcolm McLean says: “There has certainly been an increase in the number of calls in relation to Sipps. People who invest in Sipps, we have always said, ought to be reasonably sophisticated investors. The value of a Sipp is to take advantage of the flexibility and other things that it offers and if the customer does not need that or does not want it they probably should not be in a Sipp.”

He is concerned about clients paying extra charges for benefits that they are not even aware of.

McLean says there have been thousands of calls from people concerned about how the downturn in the stockmarket has affected their pensions and some did not even realise that their pensions were invested in the stockmarket.

The report also notes a large number of complaints about insurers’ administration, particularly problems following insurance company mergers and takeovers.

Hargreaves Lansdown pensions analyst Laith Khalaf says: “If the clients in Sipps are paying lower charges than they would if they were in an all-star personal pension and are not using the wider investment options, then that is not a problem but if they are paying higher charges, then they should not be in there.”

Recommended

First two years of growth goes 2plan

2plan Wealth Management has increased its IFA numbers from 22 at the end of 2007 to 180 advisers after two years of trading.

Martin Werth

Stencilled on the glass walls of the meeting rooms in Fortis’s City offices is a timeline charting key events in London’s financial history. Starting in the 1700s, the dates end at 2007, with no inclusion so far of the dramatic events of the last 18 months.

Close Special Situations tops performance chart

The Close Special Situations fund was the best performing vehicle for the first two quarters of the year, according to research carried out by Thames River.The British small-cap fund returned 42.9% in the first three months of the year, followed by another 51.2% in the second quarter. Its peer group, UK Smaller Companies, was also […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Sipps sometimes better for IFAs than Clients ?
    Some people will have gone into SIPPs with their eyes open and are dealing in “E” Sipps in direct shares at very low costs, they may have problems with admin but this happens with non SIPP portfolios too.

    Others might have been pushed into SIPPs by Commission advisors who were able to extract 3-6% bid offer spreads they could not have got on Stakeholders; these latter may very well have been lead up the garden for the wrong reasons.

Leave a comment