View more on these topics

Columbia Threadneedle to pay for research under Mifid II

EU-Euro-Europe-Eurozone-700x450.jpgColumbia Threadneedle will pay for its own research under Mifid II as one of the last remaining asset managers to decide their plans announce their intentions.

In a note sent to clients and seen by Money Marketing, the global asset manager says it will absorb research costs within the firm’s own accounts, instead of passing commission fees to clients.

The firm says it is “on track” to comply with the regulation.

The note says: “As an active manager, our investment process uses extensive in-house research supplemented with specialist research acquired from third party research providers. This enables us to selectively access broader knowledge to generate performance across our strategies.

“From January 2018, external research costs that we incur on behalf of clients of our Mifid II firms will be paid for by Columbia Threadneedle. We will maintain our extensive internal research activities.  Our approach to third party research funding under Mifid II provides clarity and simplicity for clients.”

The company also says it will use the European Mifid Template to report fees and charges of its funds. This standardised template is free to use, but not compulsory under the European regulation.

The firm says: “This standardised method of reporting costs and charges aims to make it easier to understand and compare charges across the industry.”

Money Marketing recently sat down with Columbia Threadneedle EMEA chief executive  Michelle Scrimgeour, read the full profile later this week 



Aegon to drop Cofunds brand in platform upgrade

Aegon is dropping the Cofunds brand as it moves users onto an upgraded version of its platform. After acquiring Cofunds in August last year, Aegon has been working on integrating the platform with its Aegon Retirement Choices offering, bringing many of Cofunds’ features into ARC. Users were due to be transferred to the new Aegon/Cofunds […]


SJP under fire again over charges and exit fees

Clients of St James’s Place have attacked the firm over what they say is an opaque charging structure and punitive levels of exit fees. The Sunday Times was asked to examine what retired solicitor Arnold Rosen had been charged by SJP between 2009 and 2015 after Rosen could not work out the level of charges […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment