View more on these topics

Coalition split over Diamond appointment

The appointment of Bob Diamond as the chief executive of Barclays has revealed a split in the coalition along party lines.

According to reports, senior Liberal Democrats have crticised the appointment but the Prime Minister and the Treasury declined to do so.

Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman Lord Oakshott said the bank was “putting up two fingers” to the Government and the Bank of England, calling the appointment “outrageous”.

He says: “He is a great gambler but he has no experience of retail banking. It is an extraordinary decision by the Barclays board.”

The Times says business secretary Vince Cable “privately made clear his concerns”, apparently arguing the bank “failed to appreciate public anxiety about the risks posed to by investment banks”.

Speaking in Brussels yesterday chancellor George Osborne said: “It is up to the shareholders who the chief executive of Barclays is and I very much look forward to working with Bob Diamond on issues of mutual concern.”

The Liberal Democrats want “universal” banks to be broken and while the coalition have set up a commission to look at the future of banking the chancellor retains the right to ignore its findings.

The commission is due to report next year.

Osborne said: “I want London to be a competitive place to do business but I also want to make sure that the British taxpayer is protected in a way that it was not in the past from the systemic risk that very large banks can pose.”

During the election Osborne singled out Diamond for criticism saying his pay and incentive package in the wake of the financial crisis “beggared belief”.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I suspect Bob Diamond knows more about the workings of retail banking and economics generally than Lord Oakshott will ever know in his lifetime.

    Yet more populist posturing from, I suspect, intellectually challenged politicians.

  2. Has Barclays been bailed out by the taxpayer. Didnt think so.

    We all know the record of nationalised industries in the past. Government intervention in how companies are run never works.

  3. Barclays were one of the few banks that didn’t require a tax payers handout. It seems the UK knows the cost of every thing and the value of nothing! It is this politic of envy that is driving the UK into the land of mediocraty. Pity the great unwashed don’t apply the same standards to their football player!

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm