View more on these topics

Coalition shifts wholesale funding stance

Mortgage experts believe the coalition Government has changed its stance on wholesale funding, offering hope that it may take steps to resolve the current funding shortfall.

Before the election, the Conservative party pledged in its manifesto to make the mortgage market less dependent on wholesale funding.

It said: “We will reform the regulation and structure of the banking system to ensure lower levels of leverage, less dependence on unstable wholesale funding and greater availability of credit for small and medium-sized enterprises.”

However, a recent Treasury green paper entitled, Financing the Private Sector Recovery, says: “Securitisation can be an important source of funding for both banks and non-bank lenders. The financial crisis indicated significant underlying failings in these markets as previously constituted and underlines the importance of reform to ensure that in the future the securitisation market is a more sustainable and robust market.”

Cicero Consulting director Iain Anderson says: “There is absolutely no doubt that since the election there has been a marked shift in the stance of the coalition from what they were saying before the election which suggested they would not touch wholesale funding with a bargepole.”

Anderson says the change is probably due to the coalition having access to the kind of data that is only available to parties in Government. He adds: “They clearly appreciate the impact on the market of not having a free-flowing wholesale market. There is a recognition in Government of the need to look at mechanisms to bring the market back.”

A Council of Mortgage Lenders spokesman says: “Clearly, we would like to see a return to a robust and secure securitisation market. What is missing is a plan for getting there and, in the meantime, lenders and borrowers are affected by a shortage of mortgage funding.”

Recommended

Rates of change

Interest-only borrowers face a tough test when they come to remortgaging

2

Don’t hide your TERs

The issue of cost is something that regularly gets debated when looking at the fund management industry, with wide ranging discussions about what represents ‘good value for money’. The truest representation of cost to an investor is through the Total Expense Ratio and these can range from as little as 0.2 per cent to upwards […]

20

Interest rates could rise to 8% by 2012

The Policy Exchange has warned that interest rates could rise to 8 per cent by 2012 if inflation spirals out of control. The think tank’s chief economist Andrew Lilico says the Bank of England may be forced to dramatically increase the base rate due to rapidly rising inflation. This is in stark contrast with Ernst […]

Introducing Trevor Greetham

Ryan Medlock, Investment Proposition Manager, Royal London Royal London Asset Management’s (RLAM) new head of multi-asset is officially up and running. I want to look at what expertise Trevor brings to the table and how this affects the Governed Portfolios (GPs) and Governed Retirement Income Portfolios (GRIPs). Trevor Greetham joined RLAM in April 2015 from […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. “Anderson says the change is probably due to the coalition having access to the kind of data that is only available to parties in Government”.
    Surely this blows away the myth of the benefits of having “outside interests” being beneficial to democratic government -it simply does not exist in the real world.

  2. I hope that the so called investment bankers pay for “full structural surveys” instead of a “valuation for mortgage purpose” ignoring “book value” before parting with our money putting bonus first. Regulators, FSA.GOV.UK, BANK OF ENGLAND AND THE TREASUARY, should stop the practice of giving INVESTMENT BANKERS or people with fancy names and titles a free hand to do as they like and purchase in any market with no concern for quality or underwriting standards. While continuing the crucifixion of those on the front line, AR’s, IFA’s and mortgage brokers who do an excellent job under the guise that they are all “rouges on the register” and the FSA.GOV.UK is the consumer champion dishing out the pill of TCF (treating customers fairly) medicine.

    Last but not least, is it not time that the law and courts that give tenants rights are updated so that tenants are made to understand that their “Home will be repossessed if rent is not and paid late defaults will be registered against them?” Why is it right that landlords, normal people investing for their future instead relying on the state, and lenders should go out of business because tenants are free to do as they like with the blessing of the state and the courts? Why it is right that they must meet the monthly interest payments and the tenant can go on holidays using the rent money?

Leave a comment