View more on these topics

Clients are prepared to pay more for planning, advisers argue

pfs panel

Three top advisers have argued firms should charge more for planning as clients are becoming more willing to pay for these services.

At the Personal Finance Society’s National Symposium in London last week, Thornton Chartered Financial Planners, Killik & Co and Informed Choice noted a trend that clients are accepting higher charges for advice, provided the value of the plan is made clear.

Thornton Chartered Financial Planners charges a minimum of £1,500 for plans but holds first meetings for free.

Managing director Sharon Sutton said: “Most clients thought we didn’t charge them enough for the financial plan.

“It’s very much driven by what the value of the financial plan is. The plan is what clients value in terms of advisers finding out more about them, their story and helping them understand better what they want to achieve.”

Killik & Co wealth planning partner Sarah Lord said her firm was continuing to transition away from its traditional investment management fees as a result of the value clients place on the financial plan.

She said: “We have grown financial planning within a historically stockbroking and investment management business. We are charging fixed fees for the plan based on hourly rates and complexity.

“When you try and pull those two together to demonstrate the value to the client it can be a challenging conversation, because what is the client actually placing the value on? Is it the investment management or the financial plan they are getting at the outset? What we are seeing is a gradual shift in client mindset that actually they want the plan to be more important.”

Informed Choice charges for advice based on an upfront fee that includes planning charges.

Executive director Nick Bamford said: “In terms of pricing, some situations are much more complex but we have wrapped in the implementation together with the advice and planning part of it.”

He added higher charges are justified in light of the value advisers add.

He said: “The industry is getting challenged on some of its pricing, but people don’t understand what we have to do. The job we do is so valuable we need to be charging profitable levels.”

Recommended

3

Redefining advice: The impact on adviser charging models

Advisers have raised concerns the Treasury’s plan to redefine advice could have unintended consequences and lead to confusion around charging structures. The new definition was put forward as part of a consultation last week. Although aimed at simplifying the advice boundary, concerns have been raised about how advisers should bill clients for work that falls outside […]

Cicutti-Nic-2014-MM-700.jpg
16

Nic Cicutti: There’s more to adviser charging than PFS thinks

One of the delights of being involved – if only tangentially and as an irresponsible commentator – in the ongoing discussions about the future of financial services is hearing other people’s viewpoints. Some of those views, especially those often found attached below an online column of mine are of the, ahem, more robust variety. Others […]

Business-Handover-Finance-General-700.jpg

Better Business: Proper disclosure of adviser charging

The FCA has published its findings on adviser charging following its review of 113 firms in October 2013 in TR14/6, Supervising Retail Investment Firms: Being Clear About Adviser Charges and Services.  The message is clearly that the FCA is not happy. It states: “…the level of non-compliance we identified and the failure of firms to meet […]

Graphic Content – August

Given the release of employment data from the US on 5 August, we wanted to focus on employment data in this month’s Graphic Content. The Graphic Content below shows us that young and middle-aged workers were hit the hardest by the Great Recession and have never caught up. Since the job market started to recover […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment