View more on these topics

Claire Trott: Brace for another Budget shake-up to pensions


The Budget is less than three weeks away and is set to provide another shake-up to the pensions world. Or so we have been led to believe. Here is a round-up of the key events we anticipate.

Changes to tax relief on contributions

The biggest question mark hangs over the issue of pensions tax relief. The consultation launched at the last Budget – Strengthening The Incentive To Save: A Consultation on Pensions Tax Relief  – has long since closed and the Government has been busy working on a response to what we can only assume was a barrage of information and comments from interested parties.

The 2015 Autumn Statement stated the response should be expected in this upcoming Budget but there may well be another consultation on the implementation of the proposals. It is unlikely to come in with immediate effect, assuming there is a change.

The most recent information leads us to believe marginal rate relief will be scrapped in favour of a flat rate arrangement. This would mean higher and additional rate taxpayers will receive less tax relief and basic rate taxpayers will receive additional tax relief on their contributions. If this is the case, it is likely there will be a consultation on issues such as salary sacrifice, net pay arrangements and how to ensure employer contributions and changes to contracts are not used to bypass the new restrictions for high earners.

Salary sacrifice

If flat rate pension tax relief is brought in, then salary sacrifice will need to be curtailed or scrapped entirely, or else it could possibly just add to the complexities.

What happens will depend upon how employer pension contributions will be treated going forward. If they have a tax charge applied to them dependent on the level of tax the individual pays, then there will be a knock-on effect on the schemes that operate this as a default option.

By paying contributions in this way, the employer will have been saving National Insurance contributions, so may want that to continue. However, the added complexity this will bring could mean they will revert back to normal personal and employer contributions.

It may just be easier to remove the option of salary sacrifice entirely, which may impact on other benefits currently funded this way. It would also mean more NICs will be paid by both the employer and employee, without any real tangible benefit in exchange.

Lifetime allowance

The lifetime allowance is already due to fall from £1.25m to £1m on 6 April, so you would hope there would be no additional changes announced in the Budget. However, it has been reported there is a possibility of a further drop.

The figure being suggested is £750,000, which equates to a pension of only £37,500 from a defined benefit scheme without commutation and a fund of only £562,500 after the pension commencement lump sum. I feel this is unlikely because the previous drop has not even come into force yet.

On the other side of the fence, some have suggested the lifetime allowance could actually go altogether if we see the flat rate pension tax relief brought in. I agree this would be preferable but it does not seem likely in the current climate as the removal of the lifetime allowance would mean a significant amount of lost tax revenue.

Annual allowance

We are bracing ourselves for the taper of the annual allowance but this may not be the worst thing to come. If flat rate relief is brought in, the level at which the taper is applied could be reduced to catch those paying higher rate tax and not just those paying additional rate tax, which is where it is currently aimed. We saw something similar with anti-forestalling back in 2009, when the level dropped to catch more people.

If this level is reduced significantly to stop those who will lose relief following the introduction of the flat rate, it would make sense to just scrap the whole thing and drop the annual allowance for everyone. This would be preferable for most because it would bring some sort of certainty to the levels they can contribute at the beginning of the tax year. The current taper rules mean it is very difficult for those caught to be sure of their annual allowance until the end of the tax year when their overall income can be confirmed, everything can be counted and the allowance accurately calculated.

Secondary annuity market

The secondary annuity market is planned to be launched in April 2017 (the full details of which should be in the Finance Bill 2016) but there are still so many areas to be ironed out to ensure it will work as intended. We are due further consultation on the tax framework, as well as amendments to allow the assignment of annuities, which is key to the proposals. There is also the need for additional consultation on the advice requirement for the sale of an existing annuity. Many of these issues may be addressed in the Budget 2016 documents.

Rectifying anomalies

There is also scope for some anomalies that crept in during previous Finance Acts to be rectified. One that has been around for many years is the lack of options for those who may want to take their pension commencement lump sum from their existing scheme then transfer to another scheme to take drawdown.

This is currently only possible if the ceding scheme can facilitate drawdown in the first place. It is not possible to do an open market option to drawdown the way it is for an annuity. This type of change could have a greater impact on the pension freedoms options available to those in schemes that cannot or will not change their rules.

Claire Trott is head of pensions technical at Talbot and Muir



Hornbuckle parent acquires failed Avalon platform

The parent of Sipp firm Hornbuckle has taken over stricken platform and Sipp provider Avalon Investment Services. Embark Group has set up a new firm, Embark Investment Services, to take control of Avalon’s £300m of assets and 50,000 clients – of which 1,200 have Sipps. Avalon applied to go into special administration this week after […]


Aberdeen to slash fees on three funds

Aberdeen Asset Management is cutting the fees on three of its funds. In letters sent to investors, the asset manager says it will cut fees on the £166m World Emerging Markets Equity fund, the £1bn UK Enhanced Equity fund and the £1.1bn Foundation Growth fund. The annual management charge on the class A shares of the […]


One in three advisers back FCA commission U-turn

More than a third of advisers would support the return of commission as a revenue source in the advice market, research suggests. A poll of 429 advisers conducted by CoreData Research found that 34 per cent would welcome the return of commission. A further 13 per cent said they were uncertain, while 53 per cent […]

Recording sickness absence cover - thumbnail

White paper — recording sickness absence

The latest figures from the Department for Work and Pensions illustrate that sickness absence is still a major cost to businesses, with an annual bill for sick pay and associated costs to employers of £9bn. This paper from Jelf Employee Benefits looks at the importance of recording sickness absence for any employee health strategy and how this can be carried out in an efficient manner to reduce absence, improve employee engagement and drive up profits.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Best advice is to ‘brace’ big time. Padded suits, crash helmets the lot. Osborne needs to find serious money over the next few years and really, he can go as wild as he wants. High earners, and possibly all earners will squeal, but how many will vote for Jeremy when the time comes who didn’t intend to already? Thinking about it, I’d put on one of those blast protection suits they wear in The Hurt Locker. Budget could be a crazy ride.

  2. You may be right. He does not need to find the money; he could do what every sensible government does and run a deficit when tax receipts are low. But a zero deficit is Osborne’s vanity project. He has staked his political reputation on it and is quite likely to allow anything to be sacrificed for it, pensions included.

  3. I love the statement equates to pension of ‘Only’ £37k. Must be all civil servants and ring fenced.

  4. I think Osborne will come under pressure from Cameron and back benchers to make sure that the privileged are not pissed off with the EU referendum coming up. However he does need to raise cash, so he is caught between a rock and a hard place. Which way will he fall…..I think we all know the answer…….or do we? Whatever he does could split the government irreparably.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm