View more on these topics

Cirencester pays 94% of IP claims

Cirencester Friendly paid out 94 per cent of all income protection claims last year, totalling £2.6m.

The IP provider says declined claims were due to non-disclosure and no evidence of loss of earnings.

Chief executive Paul Hudson says: “It is gratifying to see just how much is being paid out for income protection products.”

But Hudson is now calling for the industry to provide a more detailed breakdown of all individual providers’ claims rates, as well as an industry wide figure.

He adds: “Claims statistics are particularly useful in determining how likely the firm is going pay-out should a policy holder have to make a claim.”  

Recommended

Bursting my bubble

As regular visitors to this page may well be aware, perhaps the only thing I ever had in common with Michael Jackson was an interest in the behaviour of bubbles. Indeed, having again touched on the subject only a few weeks back, I had resolved to steer clear of it for the foreseeable future – […]

2

Phoenix purchases Mortgage Times assets

Mortgage Times’ administrators Kelmanson Insolvency Solutions has revealed that Phoenix CPG Ltd has purchased assets from the failed mortgage network, including servicing rights to orphan clients.

Thumbnail

Case study: administration — managing group life schemes

Our client leads the global market in high-tech electronics manufacturing and digital media. The trustees of the company’s final salary pension scheme insure death-in-service lump sum and dependants’ pension death benefits for active employees, as well as dependants’ pension benefits for deferred members (those who have left service).

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Hector, Lord Turner

    This is socially useful financial services, like Paul Hudson I wonder how the service provided by this Society compares with the rest of the market.

    It worries me that the FSA believes that what the banks sell is ‘better than nothing’.

    Will this socially useful product be available to the wider market post RDR? If not, why not? Does that then beg the question “is the RDR socially useful”.

Leave a comment