View more on these topics

Chris Hannant: The burden of European regulation

The Government and the FCA need to ensure EU rules are implemented in a way best suited to UK businesses.


With an election to the European Parliament coming up in May, we have seen a flurry of regulatory activity. As is often the case, an election tends to focus minds amongst the current group of MEPs as they realise they may not be returning. Mifid II (Markets in Financial Instruments Directive) reached agreement recently and now the Prips (Packaged Retail Investment Products) regulation has reached the “trilogue” process.

Although Prips is supposedly about product disclosure for insurance investment products, we have seen measures creep in that will apply to advisers.

In the autumn, we saw a proposal to cap advisers’ fees for advice. Apfa identified this proposal, lobbied hard with MEPs and succeeded in getting this deleted. Earlier in the process there was a proposal that advisers be made jointly responsible with providers for product information. This too has been removed.

There remain issues with the requirements to include information on advisers’ remuneration in an annex (as this merely duplicates information that clients already receive) and provisions relating to the basis of fees (which complicate and duplicate existing requirements). These issues have not been finalised yet and Apfa is pressing for them to be deleted.

If they remain, one might take the view that if these requirements are already required and done, they will not add to the regulatory burden. But although the information is provided, the exact form and manner differ.

A further complicating factor is that Prips is a regulation, which means it has direct effect in UK law. This prohibits the FCA from adapting the provisions to its rule book. As a result, I believe they should adapt the rulebook to the Prips provisions. 

The more common form of EU legislation is a directive. These allow individual nation states to adapt their implementation to reflect national needs so long as they align with the directive’s intention.

With a regulation, the FCA will have no room to change the legislation, but does have scope to adapt existing requirements.

It will be essential that it thinks carefully about how any new requirements fit with current ones and ensure they are dovetailed, as far as possible, so that the customer is clear about the proposition and compliance burdens are limited on firms.

The fact that it is a regulation should not mean the FCA does not properly consider its impact and the need to adjust current rules.

A more creative approach is also needed in respect of the implementation of directives. For fear of being accused of “gold plating”, there is a tendency to copy out the text of the directive.

The text is the result of negotiation and as a consequence can often be vague. While the regulator should not stray from the core purpose of the directive, providing greater clarity as to its meaning should be normal practice.

Firms need to understand what is required of them, and for that to be the case the regulator should use more common sense and exercise discretion when implementing European legislation. The Government and FCA need to show a greater willingness to implement EU directives in a manner which best suits firms in the UK.

 Chris Hannant is director general of the Association of Professional Financial Advisers



John Greenwood: The haves and have nots of state pension reform

I am sure Steve Webb is uncomfortable with the fact that he will be better off to the tune of £43,000 or so on account of the policy he is shepherding through Parliament. He is probably also dismayed at the thought that someone his age who has worked all their adult life but has not […]


Richard Verdin: Aren’t all life premiums ‘loaded’?

It’s been a while since I wrote regularly for Money Marketing. I now work for a reinsurer, last time I was an insurer, before that an online broker and before that a face-to-face adviser. What can I say, I get around. However ‘getting around’ has allowed me to understand many perspectives. I recently had a lot […]

Is volatility dead? No, sell credit

There are several arguments that one could currently make for why credit markets look unattractive. These include signals that the US economy is in late cycle, the fact that corporate leverage has been increasing (with 2016 setting a record for the amount of global bond issuance), and that US high-yield default rates have risen considerably […]

Global income: preparing for a rate rise…

In the five years since we launched the Artemis Global Income Fund, its manager Jacob de Tusch-Lec has built a distinctive portfolio that is first among its peers. Here he explains why his “quality, cyclical and value yield” stocks, and flexible approach, leave the fund better placed to benefit from uncertainty than funds that depend […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm