View more on these topics

Chris Hannant: FCA needs to walk the walk

Chris-Hannant-MM-Peach-700x450.jpg

As the Apfa AGM looms later this week, it will be a year since we changed our name.

I do not consider this as a first birthday, as the name change was necessitated in order to carry on representing financial advisers. But it marks another year in which much has happened.

Most obviously the RDR came into force and the FSA was replaced by the FCA and PRA. We have yet to see the full impact of the RDR which I believe will take some years fully to bed down.  But we have already seen a sharp reduction in adviser numbers (even if there has been a small boost from those who just missed the deadline).

Next year will provide a better picture of the overall impact on business as we obtain full year data on profitability, turnover, and client numbers.

We remain concerned about the effect on the client in terms of access to advice and the viability of providing advice to those clients with fewer assets. We are preparing evidence for the FCA’s post-implementation review due in 2014, in which we will press for stability for the sector.

The fall in adviser numbers and the rising cost of giving advice places greater focus on the ability of consumers to access advice. Apfa’s Regulatory Dividend campaign is aimed at lowering the direct and indirect costs for an advisory business but not the standards of consumer protection.

We believe the FCA could do much to help, such as address adviser reporting, regulatory fees and the introduction of a long stop.  We need a regulatory framework which is proportionate and enables a functioning market for advice not one that suffocates it.

So it is with this hope we welcomed the creation of the new regulator. The FCA has set out an interesting agenda that promises the potential for better regulation. Greater transparency; more emphasis on markets that work rather than rule making; measurable performance indicators; and, not least, better value for money. So far this has been promising talk.

The coming year will see whether the FCA can deliver on this. Apfa will be monitoring progress. I think there are some positive signs on fees and we will work with and support the National Audit Office in its proposed review of the FCA for value for money – finally providing some much needed scrutiny of regulatory costs.

An issue of increasing significance and one where advisers will have a positive role to play will be financial planning for retirement.

As the state steps away from provision for retirement needs, individuals increasingly need to look to their own resources and manage them effectively. Policy issues such as pension provision, auto-enrolment and financing long term care highlight the need for effective advice and planning. This is an opportunity to demonstrate the value and need for financial advice. Promoting financial advice as part of the solution enables Apfa to support a healthy and growing advice sector.

So we head into our second year as Apfa with 2014 approaching. From everything I see, there will be a continuing, if not greater need for financial advice, and Apfa will be doing all it can to bring about the best environment for financial advice businesses.

Chris Hannant is director general at the Association of Professional Financial Advisers

Recommended

FCA-FSA-Building-700x450.jpg
2

FCA bulk conversions paper: Where the regulator went wrong

Platforms and the Investment Management Association want clarity from the FCA on deciding whether to convert clients to clean share classes. The FCA issued its guidance consultation on converting clients to post-RDR share classes last month, with the consultation closing last week. The paper states: “A conversion should take place only if it is fair and in the client’s […]

Professional standards take centre stage

Professional standards have taken centre stage this month, with the Institute of Financial Planning and the Chartered Insurance Institute both announcing changes to their supervision of this area. The IFP has created a new position of director of professional standards and has appointed Sam Rees-Adams to the role. Rees-Adams’ new position replaces Sue Leech who is […]

My Beautiful Career: John Perks

What was your first job within financial services? My first job, back in 1992, was in the actuarial department at Swiss Life (UK), supporting the group scheme underwriting and annuity businesses. It was the first time I had heard of actuaries, having emerged into the world of financial services via an engineering degree. As you […]

Tom-Selby-MM-Peach-700.jpg
10

Pensions industry must eradicate annuity ‘never’ events

The National Health Service has a long list of horrific “never” events. As the name suggests these are preventable mistakes, such as leaving foreign objects inside patients or amputating the wrong limb, for which there is zero tolerance for error. In a Channel 4 pensions documentary on Monday night, we heard the case of Frank […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Sorry Chris
    Like you all the FSA did was change its name to !! it wasn’t replaced; as its the same incompetent fools sat behind the same empty desks, looking for another way to keep the money rolling in to fund their bonuses, expenses, hobnobs & tea
    They have even have been found out for overcharging fee block A13 118 million quid ! are they going to give it back ? not on your nelly !!

  2. Walk the walk instead of talking the talk? Pot calling kettle black, if ever.

  3. Sorry Chris but its not going to happen. Regulators by definition have to justify their existence and they will bounce from one knee jerk to another. I promise you there will be no let up in their increasing demands and increasing costs until the industry is terminally injured. Clients being marginalised because they don’t have lots of money (a paradox if ever there was), advisers being driven insane by cock eyed requirements, networks failing or having to change their business model, banks refusing to bear the cost of compliance without the promise of profit and no new blood entering the fray. Walk the walk? You mean crawl on your knees.

  4. Can we stop using the phrase “regulatory dividend”. It might make for a decent soundbite (once) but it suggest a quid pro quo approach which is almost impossible to imagine working with a regulator with such a varied audience to provide rules and guidance for.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com