Chris Gilchrist: False precision is the enemy of financial planning

Most of the columns I have written for Money Marketing have been number free. I could have cited lots of numbers in support of whatever point I was making but this practice, which many still use, strikes me as old-fashioned.

If you present an argument that encourages readers to question the numbers, isn’t it better not to pre-select the evidence?

Unlike the days I began my career in financial journalism, the numbers are not buried in publications sitting on shelves so that you do the reader a favour by including them. On the contrary, almost all the numbers are easily accessible to everyone and it is not hard to work out which are more and which are less reliable.

How relevant is this to Adviceworld? Well, think about the numbers included in reports, analyses and cash flow illustrations.

Chris Gilchrist: Specialist advisers will be the winners of the future

In a publication like Money Marketing I can focus on the argument and expect readers to follow because we share a knowledge base. But we cannot assume that of clients. We need to make it easier for them to understand things by using graphics, illustrations and simplification.

There is a conflict between communicating effectively through simplification and being precisely accurate. Yet regulations and their interpretation by compliance geeks tend to mean that precision, however spurious, wins out at the expense of comprehension.

The new Kiids are a case in point. The numbers they contain are precise but they are also fundamentally misleading because the methodology is flawed.

Warren Buffett’s principle, “It is better to be approximately right than precisely wrong” is not applicable in every field. You would not want air traffic controllers or brain surgeons thinking like that. But it does apply to financial planning because almost every aspect of a financial plan is provisional and subject to revision.

After all, a financial plan is constructed not to serve financial goals but life goals and objectives. The proportion of clients that arrive at advisers with precise and clear goals is vanishingly small. With our help, they can define them more clearly but they will remain (as, in most cases, they should be) fuzzy.

Graham Bentley: Why IFAs can end up in my firing line

False precision in relation to fuzzy goals bakes an unsatisfactory cake.

There is an elusive balance between using approximate pictures to describe the journey and precise numbers to underpin the analysis and recommendations. I do not think there is a right way to do this, since firms ought to tailor their communications to their clients, and we know some clients handle pictures better than words and vice versa.

So, the last thing we need is more top-down regulatory prescription about suitability reports. Let them be tested in the real world (client feedback is essential) and – where necessary – by the Financial Ombudsman Service.

Chris Gilchrist is director of Fiveways Financial Planning

Recommended

2

Do retirement savers need national targets?

For many people, pensions are too confusing or such a long way off it does not seem real. Their annual pension statement may not make much sense because it is not set within the context of lifestyle. But translate the hard facts and figures into something they can relate to and it might be a […]

7

British Steel IFA: Many advisers ‘misinterpret’ FCA transfer rules

A British Steel IFA who has had their transfer permissions reinstated says many advisers have “misinterpreted” the FCA’s regulations on the subject. In February, County Capital Wealth Management, which trades as The Pensions Review Service, became one of the 10 firms that voluntarily agreed to stop doing transfer work with the watchdog. It regained permission […]

Dennis Hall
59

Dennis Hall: Why we are reducing portfolios to just one fund

If you agree with the premise that funds with high charges generally underperform those with low charges, then you must also agree a portfolio that accrues high costs will generally underperform one with lower costs. And if you accept this, the obvious conclusion is to hack away anything that increases that cost. Switching from higher-priced […]

Careful-Research-Business-Finance-Paperwork-700.jpg

Global high yield outlook 2018

RLAM’s Head of Global High Yield, Azhar Hussain examines trends in the high yield and loans markets in a short video. Watch the video here Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income from them is not guaranteed and may go down as well as up and […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Great article I am fed up to the back teeth with spurious accuracy the one thing projections inevitably are is wrong!

    Monte Carlo or otherwise they are have flaws we need to paint a picture but it should never be seen or promoted as science or accurate in every detail.

    Prescription leads to inertia

    R

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com