View more on these topics

Chris Gilchrist: Are investors informed on high-yield bond risks?

Today’s financial markets are fixated on liquidity. This is a natural consequence of a belief in the axioms of finance and modern portfolio theory, because in the artificial world of MPT, liquidity is directly related to risk.

If you define risk as the tendency of an investment to vary from its smoothed monthly return, then a lack of market liquidity that causes such variations is a bad thing, since it gives you a higher volatility reading. As a fund manager you have to avoid this, since performance geeks think such variations mean the manager is putting investors’ money ‘at risk’ in some meaningful way, and you also have to stick a higher risk number on your KIID.

Regulators – also believers in finance theory – think that a greater ability to buy and sell reduces investors’ risks regardless of the quality of the investments.

The facts tell the opposite story, which is that liquidity simply follows activity. At the peak of the tulip bubble in Amsterdam in the seventeenth century you could buy or sell quantities of tulips worth several merchant ships in a morning. At the peak of the dotcom bubble in 2000 you could readily buy or sell millions of pounds worth of shares in soon-to-be-worthless start-ups with no profits or assets. Such liquidity told you nothing about the level of risk involved.

Now consider liquidity in relation to high-yield bonds. These are securities that are not traded on a regulated exchange. The market-makers are banks which since 2007 have withdrawn between 50 per cent and 80 per cent of the capital they used to apply to holding stock. In 2008, bid-offer spreads widened to 15 per cent or more; many bonds were untradeable for weeks. It is a fundamentally illiquid market.

Historically, this didn’t matter. Those who bought high-yield bonds before 2000 were institutional investors buy-and-holding as sweeteners to a diversified bond portfolio, or hedge fund gamblers prepared to take serious losses if they got market direction or their credit analysis wrong.

Only one of these strategies remains viable: buy and hold. The lack of market-making capacity means the market is liable to be a one-way street. It is so now, with most new issues simply refinancing part of the existing stock of bonds, and a shortage of supply making the uptrend look smooth and liquidity tolerable. Everyone believes the prices quoted by banks, because almost nobody is trying to sell. What if? The FSA has asked the question but this elephant is just too big for them so they have put their pea-shooters away.

The surest sign of the imminent end of a trend is when it spawns new categories of financial instrument (think triple-A MBS). Today we have high-yield bond exchange traded funds and futures on questionable indices being created simply to allow fund managers to get invested without having to wait to buy individual bonds. But no derivative can be more liquid than its underlying securities. If the derivative appears to be more liquid – high-yield bond ETFs look more tradeable than their constituents – smoke and mirrors are at work. All they can do is briefly make the swamp look like solid tarmac.

As with land, art, wine and timber, high-yield bonds are illiquid investments that should be confined to closed-end fund portfolios. Or open-end investors should be warned up front that they may have to wait months for their money back. Or it could get very messy.

Chris Gilchrist is director of FiveWays Financial Planning, edits the IRS Report newsletter and is the author of the Taxbriefs Guide, The Process of Financial Planning



HMRC allows hundreds of tax evaders to avoid courts

A list of hundreds of potential tax evaders who form part of the “Lagarde list” will avoid prosecution and escape from having their identities revealed as part of immunity deals with HMRC, say reports. The Times reports only one person on a list of 6,000 tax dodgers has been convicted of serious fraud. Only 500 […]

Toscafund to launch global financials fund for retail investors

Asset manager Toscafund is to launch a global financials fund on the T. Bailey administration platform, which has seen the latter named authorised corporate director of the new launch. The Aptus Global Financials fund will aim to produce long-term capital and income growth by investing in a portfolio of global financial services companies, including banks […]

ABI to propose radical pensions drawdown solution

The Association of British Insurers is set to propose drawdown reforms to alleviate the cuts in income savers are facing, which will shortly be presented to Government. Capped drawdown was introduced as part of the Government’s reforms to abolish compulsory annuitisation at age 75. Following the changes, which came into force in April last year, […]

Newscape launches risk-targeted multi-asset fund

Newscape Capital Group has launched the Newscape Diversified Growth fund, the second Ucits fund for the specialist investment firm. The fund, which follows the launch of the Newscape Strategic Bond fund in November 2010, will be managed using its model portfolio service and will aim to achieve a “consistent double-digit return with single-digit volatility over […]

UK gilts: Shaken and stirred

Mike Riddell, fixed income portfolio manager at Allianz Global Investors, reviews the performance of the UK government bonds market post-Brexit and assesses its future prospects, as well as giving his outlook for global fixed income markets and yields movements. In addition, he provides a brief analysis of the impact of Brexit and the Bank of […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. We have lots of synthetic ETFs nice and cheap which no-one understands.

    The article IMHO contradicts itself.

  2. Using volatility as a measure of risk is a bit like using the length of an object to measure its volume, but that goes for liquidity as well. The historic examples of the Tulip Bulbs and Dot Coms where high liquidity coupled with high risk is a pathetically weak shot at MPT.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm