View more on these topics

Chris Gilchrist: A tale of two cities

The City of London is a shining success, the specialist purveyor of complex services to the world, earner of billions for Britain, employer of most of the highest earners in the land, successful practitioner of light-touch regulation for multinational banks, hedge funds and other less visible parts of the financial system and, generally, a good thing – the Minas Tirith of money.

Up to a point. The City is opaque – even Parliament cannot see the City’s accounts, which is possibly the oddest feature of our constitution – and there is no doubt that the actions of many people working in the City support tyranny, fraud and theft, drug cartels and money laundering on a monumental scale.

For the sake of the City PRs – no, the laundering does not happen here, it happens in the tax havens. The money, when it comes to London, is clean enough to handle – or as clean as money can be when it has spent so much time with lawyers and accountants.

You could adopt a do-good attitude and say we should not allow the City to do all this on behalf of nasty people doing nasty things. I would not agree because nothing is black and white. Even if you have signed up to the Declaration of Human Rights, governance of a lot of stuff to do with money – tax collection, for example – is a domestic issue. So let the City get on with it, as far as rich foreigners are concerned.

Merchant banking sums up the type of financial piracy the City invented and is rather good at. This style of finance is archaic. It is tribal, martial and based on ancient notions of usury. In the Judaic and Christian traditions, usury was fine in relation to outsiders – you could gouge them all you liked. What was sinful and banned by the religious authorities was gouging a fellow Jew or Christian.

That view broke down as capitalism and the rationalistic European worldview spread from the 18th century. Today, we are confused about usury because while we feel it is wrong, we have no moral basis for this – humanistically, we would have to say it is right or wrong for everyone.

Which brings us back to the City and its dark twin, money’s Minas Morgul. The City has progressively abandoned rules of engagement with its domestic users based on moral and ethical codes grounded in the Christian tradition. Instead, in line with the fashionable, shallow and false neoclassical economic theory that the rules of money are a given of nature that are the same everywhere, it applies the same gouge and pillage tactics to its domestic customers as it does to foreigners.

The minimum requirement for improving things is recognising the distinction between the City on Planet London, where pinstriped pirates earn millions by fleecing billionaires, and the City that provides essential banking and investment services to Britain.

It is spectacularly failing in this second task – one much more important to us collectively than the welfare of Planet London’s City pirates, whose inflated earnings serve our welfare only by hoisting house prices and private education fees.

Chris Gilchrist is a director of FiveWays Financial Planning. He edits the IRS Report newsletter and is the author of the Taxbriefs Guide, The Process of Financial Planning

Recommended

Drag net

Fiscal drag is going nowhere fast, says Brian Murphy, financial planning manager at Axa Wealth, but it is a great opportunity for advisers to bag more business by helping clients mitigate higher-rate tax liability

HMRC staff back industrial action

Staff at HMRC have backed industrial action over budget cuts at the department, with the Public and Commercial Services Union claiming reductions in funding are undermining its ability to collect taxes. In a ballot of union members at HMRC, 52.8 per cent backed a strike while 77.2 per cent voted for other forms of industrial […]

MPs sound warning over BofE governance and accountability

The Treasury select committee has renewed calls for improvements to the governance and accountability of the Bank of England under the new regulatory architecture. The committee’s report on the Financial Services Bill, currently at the start of its passage through the House of Lords, warns arrangements for the Bank’s governance must not left to Threadneedle […]

Keith Churchouse: Taking the pain out of PI

It is that time of the year when we face the professional indemnity insurance renewal. The experience is not one I enjoy and I tend to keep it on my to-do list. What a bore it is when the weighty cover letter, requirements and application/confirmation forms land on my desk. It usually arrives three months […]

A DGT with 100% access and 100% discount?

Clare Moffat, Technical Manager, looks at the benefits of pensions from an IHT perspective. 100% access and 100% discount – what type of wrapper could this be? A pension! Post flexibility there is 100% access (for those over 55) and normally pensions are inheritance tax (IHT) free. With flexibility the options available on death mean […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Peter Butcher 7th June 2012 at 8:46 am

    There is only one solution Chris. You must journey to Mount Doom and return the Ring to the fire.

  2. Moving from fantasy to sci-fi, there are an awful lot of black holes appearing due to sovereign wealth fund involvement.
    The city failures is why Islamic Finance is becoming increasingley more attractive for NON Muslims.
    Golden Brun’s sale of England’s gold reserves could be seen by some as an act of treason. Smiler’sd invasion of Iraq is believed by many to be a breach of International Law. An invasion of a sovereign state.
    We hear on the news that the British regular |Army will be scaled back in favour of part-time reservists and “PRIVATE CONTRACTORS”. Why? Private contractors are more expensive than an idealistic 18 year old regular. They are also responsible to their employer and NOT the crown.

Leave a comment