View more on these topics

Chris Curry: Why employer pension contributions really matter

The relationship will be reversed when the minimum contribution level for auto-enrolment rise

Chris-Curry-700x450.pngHistorically in the UK, private pensions have been provided and paid for by employers. The traditional defined benefit scheme was typically funded on a ratio of around one-third employee contribution to two-thirds employer contribution (and if you take into account the deficit repair contributions now being made by employers, that ratio is even more heavily skewed towards the latter).

This relationship appeared to continue as defined contribution schemes started to replace DB ones. A similar trend can be seen internationally. In Italy, Japan and Denmark, employers typically contribute more than employees do. It is the same story in other large DC markets, including Australia, where the compulsory superannuation contribution is paid by the employer, as well as the US.

But the relationship is about to be reversed when the minimum contribution level for auto-enrolment rises.

Although currently the minimum requires a 2 per cent contribution, at least 1 per cent of which must come from the employer, this will increase from April to 5 per cent with at least 2 per cent from the employer, and again in April 2019 to 8 per cent with at least 3 per cent from the employer.

With the majority of employers only paying the minimum level of contributions, this will mean many employees’ future contributions being higher than their employers’.

Auto-enrolment for the self-employed: The future or destined for failure?

Now, if you are an economist (which sometimes I admit to), this should not matter. After all, pension contributions can be seen as part of the overall remuneration package, and even the Pensions Commission at the time of recommending auto-enrolment recognised employers paying higher pension contributions than before would, in enough time, adjust pay to compensate (although some, such as those paying the national living wage, for example, might not be able to make such an adjustment). So employer and employee contributions all come from the same pot.

But the balance between employer and employee contributions can have an impact as to how much is paid into pensions in other ways.

Research tells us that, where employers make high contributions, individuals are more willing to pay in contributions of their own, especially if the employer “matches” contributions so that the more the employee pays in, the more they get.

And, importantly, the balance of employer and employee contributions changes the dynamics around opt-out from pensions. Where an employer contribution is high, someone opting-out is giving up a valuable benefit and getting back just a relative small amount through the returned employee contribution.

If, however, the employee will get back a larger amount in returned contributions and give up a smaller benefit from the employer, then they have more incentive to stop saving and take the money now.

So not only is the total contribution to pensions important, it also matters who pays it. Higher employer contributions may well lead more from employees.

Chris Curry is director of the Pensions Policy Institute

Recommended

PFS honours Mike Morrison with lifetime achievement award

The Personal Finance Society has given its lifetime achievement award this year to veteran pension guru Mike Morrison, who sadly passed away on 6 November. The prestigious award was announced yesterday at the annual PFS awards ceremony. Morrison gained the respect of the industry through a number of roles in his 30 years working in […]

Property-Building-Growth-House-Housing-700x450.jpg
9

Fidelity to relocate 650 staff as office closes

Fidelity International is to downsize its presence in the UK further as it plans to close its Kent office and relocate 650 staff by 2020. The asset manager, which currently operates in London, Surrey and Kent, says by 2020 it will move “the majority” of the 650 employees from Tonbridge, Kent to its Kingswood office […]

Where next for UK equities?

Senior UK Equity Fund Managers Martin Cholwill, Richard Marwood and Henry Lowson answer the question ‘Where next?’ for UK equities as the reality of Brexit draws closer. Speaking with Investment Week Editor Lawrence Gosling, the managers share where they believe future opportunities within UK equity markets will arise, outlining the characteristics they look for in […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. What a loan of B””””Ks, If you think people are stupid another to think the employer wants to put into an employees pension, then your not an adviser, The employer should have no further responsibility to the employee post employment, therefore pay the employee the correct amount for their employment and allow the employee to do with it want They Want, Far to much trip is pontificated around Pensions, Far to much legislation, We all need to accumulate Income providing assets throughout our working Lives, Please stop implying Employer Contributions are the Incentive to save, I expect had NI been put on Employer Contributions Auto Enrolment would have been laughed out of Town.

Leave a comment