View more on these topics

CHARLES LEVETT-SCRIVENER

At the start of August, the FSA published a consultation paper number 61

on The Regulation of Stakeholder Pensions. At the same time, it issued a

press release which included this key point – when there is an advised

recommendation to buy a traditional pension (including one linked to a

group personal pension), the suitability letter will have to explain why

this was considered to be more suitable than a stakeholder pension.

This will have the greatest impact on IFAs. Most IFAs offer their services

on a commission basis, that is, they explain that they do not charge

clients directly as they

get commission from providers, this commission being disclosed either in

the key features document or the

reasons why letter.

This approach allows the consumer to spread the cost of the advice over

the lifetime of the policy and within

pension plans to get tax relief on the cost of advice. The added value

benefit of the IFA involvement therefore is

a relatively soft-sell.

The new FSA approach to a reasons why not letter will lead to IFAs having

to adopt a more hard-sell approach

to the added value of their service. The IFA service is a combination of

financial education, administration, financial communication,

problem-solving, product endorsement and troubleshooting. The Government&#39s

stakeholder regime assumes that the customer will not require these

services from a stakeholder provider but will adopt a

self-service approach.

Alternatively, if a customer wants these services,

they will be obliged to pay for them separately on a

fee basis or hope that the margin between the product provider charges and

the maximum stakeholder charge will generate sufficient remuneration for

the person

providing the service.

In effect, the Government is deciding on behalf of consumers both those

services which they do want to have and on behalf of the provider of that

service what price they are allowed to charge for it. This is classical

socialist command economics. Unfortunately, the history of command

economics demonstrates that such an approach leads to second-rate products

and shoddy service.

This regime could be seriously damaging for the long-term prosperity of

IFAs. The two solutions that could be adopted by IFAs are:

l Either they need to move to dealing with clients on a fee basis or

commission in lieu of fees. Some IFAs have already changed their business

to be fee-oriented but there is

considerable consumer resistance except at the top end of the market.

l Explain that you could offer your services on a commission basis and

when it comes to pension planning explain that the commission available

from stakeholder plans would not be enough to cover costs.

When you are dealing with the big corporate market, you will have to offer

services on a fee basis as commission rates simply will not support the

service level big employers will want.

The great expansion of IFA market share over the last 10 years shows

consumers can be persuaded of the benefit of independent financial advice.

Stakeholder is just another of the many challenges that have been posed by

the Government over the last few

years. I am sure the IFA community is well equipped to meet this challenge.

Recommended

BFS shapes up with shape-it

BFS Investments has designed Shape-it, a portfolio management service that also allows investors to access investment trusts through an individual savings account (Isa) and Pep transfer.Shape-it allows investors to choose their own portfolio of split capital investment trusts from the nine trusts in the BFS range. These cover BFS Asian assets through to BFS smaller […]

Network backs infomercial on Simply Shopping

IFA network DBS is backing a personal finance television programme on theSimply Shopping channel which broadcasts on Sky Digital TV. The programme, called Simply Money from DBS, will be broadcast daily foran hour from the end of May initially for a three-month trial period. Theaim is to promote understanding of financial products to up to […]

Merrill Lynch – Merrill Lynch Defined Returns

Thursday, 17 May 2001.Type: Split-cap investment trust.Aim: Income and growth linked to a basket of 30 stocks.Minimum investment: £7,000.Maximum investment: No maximum.Investment split: 100 per cent linked to a basket of 30 stocks.Types of share: Icome shares, zero-dividend preference shares.Isa link: Yes.Pep transfers: Yes.Redemption date: None.Charges: None.Commission: Initial 3 per cent.Tel: 08457 405405.

Independent view

There is an old Chinese saying: “Let us live in interesting times”. Well,life as an IFA these days is certainly interesting. What with the pension review, the FSAVC review and endowments debate, lifeas an IFA just seems to keep on getting more and more challenging. Many ofthe traditional products that used to be sold can […]

Key themes for 2017

Capital Market Notes, December 2016 Dave Lafferty, chief market strategist at Natixis Global Asset Management, assesses the accuracy of his 2016 outlook and provides his thoughts and outlook for 2017. Click here to read the full article

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment