View more on these topics

Change the climate

We are seeing a very strange argument developing between pension providers and Pada, the new personal accounts delivery authority.

Life offices are arguing that Pada must compete on a level playing field. The latest move has seen Scottish Widows’ Iain Naismith sabre-rattling about stakeholder. He says if Pada gets to levy an up-front charge, then stakeholder pension providers should be able to do so too.

I am not sure if it really is a good idea to charge more for a stakeholder pension than the 1.5 per cent cap which is already quite generous, at least over the lifetime of the scheme, although I can see the arguments advanced by Naismith about set-up costs and profitability.

Other issues focus on the fear among many providers that their already strained books of business could be further undermined as employers level down, despite Government assurances that have been given.

I understand the arguments from the providers and would hate to be developing a business plan for pension business in the current environment.

Yet the stern words from providers about Pada and how it should not be subsidised strike a discordant note when I look at this from the point of Joe Public, particularly Joe Public who has not got a funded pension.

If personal accounts are to try and fill in the gaps in pension provision where good existing schemes do not exist, then I think that providers arguing it should be be given no funding may get little sympathy.

This will particularly hold true if the Government makes good on its promises to stop good schemes dumbing down.

I cannot help thinking that, rather than being caught in an argument about how a Government should be spending next to nothing, the industry might be better demanding it spends more, not on Pada, but on fixing the benefits’ trap which still threatens to afflict the less well off if they embrace funded pension saving.

The Pensions Management Institute says this will cost £600m to fund an income disregard which would largely counteract the disincentive to save created by means testing.

It instantly stops punishing thrift, at least for the lowerincome groups. It is far from a perfect system. Means-testing continues to drag on savings higher up the earnings’ scale and could yet still overcomplicate advice.

But it could help put the Pada argument to bed and let everyone get on with increasing pension savings as an income disregard would apply to personal accounts and existing schemes.

If the goal is to reconnect large numbers of the British public with saving and get pensioners out of poverty, then it should cost money. It should be a spending priority and ways should be found to make savings elsewhere in the Government budget to allow for it.

To put things in perspective, billions of pounds have been spent in the last 20 years in pushing our society towards credit and the buy-now pay-later culture. A serious pension reform would look to reverse this trend.

But to do so will require a Herculean effort and Government cash. This may seem like anathema to this administration, which has excelled at keeping spending off the books. There is no private finance initiative for pensions but, in many ways, creating the right benefits’ infrastructure to allow savings is a bit like capital spending on bridges hospitals and schools.

I can’t help wondering if the pension industry, rather than saying the Government should not be subsidising anything, should concentrate its fire on saying that if it is serious it should be paying much more.

John Lappin is editor of Money Marketing


Axe hangs over 33 Vertex jobs

Vertex has confirmed that a further 33 jobs could be axed on its DB Mortgages’ account after a cut of 38 last November.The move would see the number of Vertex staff working for DB Mortgages reduced from 159 to 126, a drop of 36 per cent in just four months.After DB Mortgages was launched in […]

Examples of TCF shortfalls will be published

The FSA will increase its treating customers fairly push this year, focusing on monitoring industry progress and publishing examples of firms’ TCF shortfalls.Firms should undertake significant work to ensure they build on the progress made so far and pay particular attention to TCF when market conditions are more challenging.The regulator has highlighted several examples of […]

AIFA squashes rumours of a merger with BIBA

The Association of Independent Financial Advisers has denied any talks of a merger with the British Insurance Brokers’ Association following press reports that the two bodies are in discussions.

Scottish house price boom ends during Q1

Scotland has seen the first quarterly fall in house prices for seven years, according to Lloyds TSB Scotland.The bank’s regional arm’s Scottish House Price Monitor reveals the boom in Scottish house prices has come to an end.The average domestic property fell 1.6 per cent to give an average mix adjusted price of £163,211. On an […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm