View more on these topics

Danby Bloch: Centralised retirement propositions do not mean uniformity of outcomes

Danby BlochAdviser firms should have a consistent and planned approach to retirement planning but risks and client outcomes will vary.

One of the more intelligent remarks during an adviser roundtable I hosted recently for Platforum – on the subject of decumulation in retirement – was the following: “I encourage many of my clients to turn left on the airplane when they go on holiday.”

This adviser’s advice to clients was to travel by air, either business or first class – and spend more on holidays generally. Many of her clients were not spending as much as they could safely afford. Others concurred and it was an evening packed with good insights and sensible observations – as these events almost invariably are.

The adviser went on to explain what she really meant: essentially it is her job to make sure that clients made the most of their money. In many cases, that clearly means clients spending more than they previously thought they could safely do. This wasn’t a reckless recommendation to ‘spend, spend, spend’ but a clear view that she should help her clients enjoy what they had accumulated and spend more where they could afford to do so.

Cover story: Are centralised retirement propositions the future of pension planning?

This is consistent with the findings of the Institute of Fiscal Studies’ recent report that the ‘majority of financial wealth among those currently retired is set to be bequeathed rather than used to finance retirement spending.’ The IFS says this seems to be true for almost all levels of income and wealth.

Even the risk of having to spend mammoth sums on end-of-life healthcare seems to be overestimated: ‘Only a small minority of people pay out-of-pocket medical costs, a minority report assistance with daily activities from a privately paid employee and 7 per cent spent more than six months in a nursing or residential home.’ This is a good deal less than other commentators have reported; but even if the chances are nearer 4:1 than the IFS 14:1 view, it is a risk for a minority.

Of course, many clients need to be very careful and rein back expenditure to make sure they don’t run out of funds given the very real danger that they would probably live a good deal longer than their parents had. And that’s the point with retirement planning: there are so many possible risks and outcomes. Some need to economise; others could choose to spend more. So, a good starting point is to help the client make the most of their money – whatever that might turn out to be.

The problem with financial planning for old age is that everyone is more or less on their own when it comes to managing all the risks. Running out of money is the big risk and it can happen for lots of reasons.

Phil Wickenden: Start building your centralised retirement proposition now

Risk 1: Investment returns can fail to match normal spending needs. You can mitigate that for clients by using cashflow forecasting to test reasonable assumptions about investment returns and spending needs and provide some early warning of the need to take early action. You can also suggest clients should adjust their spending patterns and investment strategies.

Risk 2: People can live too long. You can mitigate that by being realistic about the risks of living far longer than the average. I was told I have a 1 per cent chance of making it to age 109 years. Only slightly delusional, I am still debating with myself whether I should run the cashflow forecast to only age 105.

Risk 3: If a client is depending on working long after retirement age they could lose their job for sickness, incompetence or bad luck. Employment rates among the over 65s have leapt in recent years according to the FCA.  In 2004, 9 per cent of men over 65 were working and by 2016 it was 14 per cent. Women over 65 increased their participation in the work market from 4 per cent in 2014 to 6 per cent in 2016.

Risk 4: A client could be faced with having to pay a thumping great bill at some point. The biggest one is likely to be for care and that’s likely to come at the end of life. Some people aim to land up dependent on the State for their care bills, but that doesn’t sound like a formula for a happy and secure old age.

So, most clients use their homes or defined contribution pensions as their reserves for care costs or other contingencies, otherwise these assets are passed down. It is right to take this kind of precautionary approach, but also use their money to enjoy their retirement.

Danby Bloch: Where are all the centralised retirement propositions?

Advisers need to discuss all these risks with clients and in many cases, a few more as well – the risk of divorce or relationship break-up, for example. Rates of these events for older couples are on the rise as retirement can put too much strain on some relationships. Just discussing investment risk seems so inadequate, however essential.

Planning for retirement can be a complicated undertaking, so it makes sense for adviser firms to try and make the process consistent and planned rather than making up as you go along. That’s increasingly known as having a centralised retirement proposition – and one thing it does not mean is uniformity of outcomes.

Danby Bloch is chairman of Helm Godfrey and consultant at Platforum

Recommended

Flurry of FCA activity to impact mortgage advisers

Regulator unveils proposed directory of senior financial services professionals, publishes fees for 2018/19 and approves new tech-based mortgage firms. The Financial Conduct Authority published a raft of reports, consultations and policy initiatives over the past month and many will have a direct impact on the mortgage sector. Recently, the FCA has put forward plans to […]

22

VouchedFor: FCA directory could see more ‘bad’ advisers being picked

The proposed FCA directory that will include advisers’ details could see more people finding “bad advisers”, according to adviser review site VouchedFor. A LinkedIn article by VouchedFor chief executive Adam Price says this is because the regulator’s consultation paper pitching the directory suggested little around underlying adviser checks being substantively improved. In the article, Price says: […]

5

FCA hits out at ‘spurious complexity’ in platform charges

FCA director of competition Mary Starks has described instances of “spurious complexity” in platform charging in the wake of the regulator’s review of the market this morning. Speaking to Money Marketing, Starks notes findings that, particularly on the direct to consumer side, platforms can levy between 15 and 35 different fees in total, and use […]

6

FCA pays out over register entry that was inaccurate for four years

The regulator has agreed to review its processes for updating the financial services register and will compensate an investor who was scammed after relying on incorrect information. A final report from the Complaints Commissioner says a complainant used the register to check the authorisation and defaults history of a credit union before buying bonds. The complainant […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. There’s no uniformity in UK State pensions provided to some pensioners who may have retired to 48 of the 53 Commonwealth nations and whose UK State pensions are unfairly frozen as soon as paid in one of these nations. It’s a totally unfair practice of blatant age discrimination, which the government claims is necessary to save £600 Million/year out of a £100 Billion pension budget! This outrageous policy is practiced even though the Commonwealth Charter claims, “the Commonwealth is implacably opposed to all forms of discrimination”. To this the British Government, in defence of its discriminatory practice, claims the Charter is “intended to promote and protect the Commonwealth democratic values”; but don’t those values include equality and fairness? The frozen pension policy needs to be revisited.

  2. I disagree that it’s unfair. The fact that emigrants spend their UK State Pension overseas has very real consequences for the UK economy and some sort of redress is perfectly reasonable. The same pension spent in the UK would be creating employment as well as supporting local businesses, increasing the tax take, etc.. Exporting money from the UK benefits the recipient countries and it is those countries that should be incentivising the pensioners to stay and spend in their country.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com