View more on these topics

Cazenove and AIG provide multi-manager bond

CAZENOVE INVESTMENT FUND MANAGEMENT

CAZENOVE UNIVERSAL INVESTMENT BOND

Aim: Growth and income by investing in four multi-manager fund of funds

Minimum investment: Lump sum £50,000

Investment split: 100% in Cazenove universal UK growth portfolio, Cazenove universal balanced portfolio, Cazenove universal growth, portfolio or Cazenove universal international portfolio (ex-UK funds).

Income facility: Yes

Charges: Initial 4.5%, annual 1.95%

Commission: Initial 4%, renewal 0.5%

Tel: 0800 0159592

The panel: Robert Briggs, Partner, Robert A Briggs,
David Flowers, Director, Ronald Blue & Co,
Bob Leonard, Director, Advisory & Brokerage Services.

Flexibility 5.7
Company&#39s reputation 8.4
Past performance 5.5
Charges 3.7
Commission 5.0
Product literature 6.7

The Cazenove universal investment bond is a unit-linked bond providing access to four Cazenove multi-manager funds through an AIG Life shell.
Looking at the market suitability of the bond Leonard says: “This takes the external fund manager concept to the next stage, whereby the underlying investment is a fund of funds concept.”

Flowers says: “This is a crowded market with many competitive offerings. Although both AIG and Cazenove bring something valuable to the table, I ma not convinced the bond will stand out drastically.” Briggs says: “I don&#39t quite see who this will appeal to, especially in the current climate. All the funds have a very high equity content.”

Identifying the types of client the bond could suit Flowers suggests the larger investor who is security conscious. Briggs says: “Basic rate taxpayers or higher-rate taxpayers likely to become a basic rate tax payers. Also, lump sum investors with £50,000 or more wanting capital growth and income. Medium to high-risk investors.” Leonard says: “This is likely to appeal to clients who already utilise their capital gains tax allowance on a regular basis.”

Considering the marketing potential for the bond Briggs says: “For me, none.” Leonard says: “I would have thought that this is a very restricted market in that most clients either do not fully utilise their annual CGT exemption, or are so wealthy they have no need ever to sell.” Flowers feels there are not many that are not already covered.

Discussing the bond&#39s attractive features Leonard says: “The strong point of the bond is that the underlying investments are constantly being reviewed and adjusted to take care of changes in investment conditions.” Flowers says: “AIG&#39s financial strength is a major feature. Cazenove is offering a range of four fund of fund portfolios, which is probably not enough of a range to give the required flexibility. The bond is structured in such a way that the lower tax liability is not passed onto the client. This should give it an edge in performance.”

Briggs highlights tax efficiency for basic rate taxpayers, the tax-free withdrawal facility, the free switching between the fund and the fund of funds approach involving major investment houses.

Turning to the bnnd&#39s drawbacks Flowers says: “It is not cheap. it is above the 1 per cent annual charge that is expected these days.” Briggs says: “It has limited fund choices, high annual management charges, the tax-free withdrawals may be affected by the Sandler report recommendations and there are no allocation rate encashments.”

Leonard says: “The main disadvantage would be the level of charges being imposed on the underlying funds. As well as the AIG charge of 0.45 per cent a year, the Cazenove Universal portfolio service charges a further 1.5 per cent. This is clearly stated in the brochure as a total 1.95 per cent a year. Unfortunately, there are additional fees incurred by the managers of the underlying unit trusts, which increase this already high annual charge. While there are no details, it would not be unreasonable to see the total annual management charge for all three layers of costs amount to at least 2.5 per cent a year or higher.”

Assessing the bond&#39s flexibility Leonard says: “The degree of flexibility seems to be at an extremely high cost.” Flowers says: “There is not a great deal of flexibility on offer here.” Briggs says: “It has no more flexibility than most bonds, but the free fund switching is an okay feature.”

Turning to the company&#39s reputation Flowers thinks Cazenove has a good reputation and a traditional values City image. He also thinks AIG&#39s reputation is good and says it has a very secure financial position.
Briggs says: “Cazenove is not a household name by my any means, but it is a large and secure institution. It is the Queen&#39s stockbroker, very blue-blooded and solid.” Leonard says: “Without a doubt, Cazenove&#39s reputation is excellent.”

Moving onto past performance Briggs complains that he cannot find any statistics. Flowers says: “It is reasonable but difficult to research. Cazenove does not have a strong retail portfolio, but its main UK funds are okay.” Leonard says: “As this is Cazenove&#39s first unitised multi-manager service, no past performance figures are available.”

Highlighting the main competition the fund could face Leonard says: “Personally, I would struggle to justify the use of an insurance bond as the ultimate wrapper and would suggest that the main competition would come from fund of funds unit trusts, including Cazenove&#39s own offering.”

Flowers says: “There are many fund of funds coming onto the market. The best is probably the Scottish Widows&#39 tie up with Frank Russell, although those funds are not cheap either. Few providers can compete with AIG for financial strength though.” Briggs mentions Scottish Widows and Skandia.

Evaluating the charges Flowers says: “The charges are reasonable, but are not particularly attractive. There are cheaper products around.” Briggs says: “The initial allocation is only 96 per cent, less a further 0.5 per cent. There are no enhancements to allocation rates for larger distributions and a 1.95 per cent annual management charge &#45 ouch.”

Leonard says: “It is difficult to even guess on the overall level of charges being incurred by investors through the bond. But one must seriously question the degree of out-performance required to justify so many levels of charges.&#39

Flowers thinks the commission is standard while Leonard regards it as a realistic level for this type of product. Briggs says: “At 4 per cent initial and 0.5 per cent renewal, it is good. But I would normally only take 3 per cent initial so there is an opportunity to give up 1 per cent.”

Looking at the product literature Briggs thinks it is professional and comprehensible.” Leonard says: “The literature is clear and concise in regard to all areas, other than the additional charges being imposed by the unit trusts managers within the underlying funds.” Flowers says: “It is quite good really, easy to read and to skim.”

Summing up Leonard says: “I would struggle to see a place for the bond within my recommendations to clients as the level of charges is likely to make the overall structure financially unattractive.” Flowers concludes: “Cazenove has selected an unusual range of funds of funds

Recommended

Birmingham Midshires pulls the trigger

Birmingham Midshires has unveiled the fifth issue of its guaranteed five-year trigger account, which is linked to the FTSE 100 index for five years.This guaranteed equity bond is available to investors with at least £1,000 to invest and guarantees the return of the original capital whatever happens to the index. It also provides a fixed […]

Multi Thai missed the real world

The Diary would like to extend a warm welcome back to former Financial Dynamics PR executive and now newest member of the growing Mainland PR team Andrew Appleyard.While the rest of us have been slogging away in the trenches for the last six months, Andrew and his young lady have been off travelling the world […]

National law firm launches new FSA unit

National law firm Russell Jones & Walker has launched a new consultancy arm looking to advise the financial services industry on regulatory issues. The new FSA Unit will combine Russell Jones & Walker&#39s experience in employment and litigation to help the industry deal with the FSA&#39s regulatory framework.The team will be based in the London […]

Graphite pays £17m to boost PIFC stake

Pension specialist IFA PIFC Benefits Consultants is getting a £17m cash injection in a deal that sees private equity firm Graphite Capital take a majority stake in the firm.Graphite is increasing its holding in PIFC to 62 per cent from the 29 per cent that it has held since 1998, with PIFC&#39s management retaining the […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com