View more on these topics

Capita valuations show fall in returns for Arch cru investors

The average amount to be returned to Arch cru investors under the FSA-agreed £54m compensation package has fallen to 66 per cent of the value of the funds at suspension, latest valuations from Capita reveal.

The FSA agreed the compensation deal between Capita Financial Managers, BNY Mellon Trust & Depositary and HSBC Bank in June. The FSA estimated at the time the compensation package would return investors an average of 70 per cent of the value of CF Arch cru funds as at March  2009 when the fund range was suspended, alongside distributions already made and remaining assets.

Capita, the authorised corporate director of the funds, published an explanatory note earlier this week which breaks down exactly how the total return figure for investors is being calculated.

The note says based on the most recent valuation information as at September 30, the estimated total return figure across all funds is 66 per cent. Capita says this figure will continue to fluctuate based on the estimated remaining value of the funds.

Capita has defended the decision to use the suspension value of the funds rather than the original investment to calculate the amount to be returned to investors. It says this is because the suspension value is what investors would have received if they had chosen to redeem their investment on the last day before suspension.

Investors can pursue their IFA to recoup the rest of their original investment.

Capita’s note explains the amount offered to each investor under the compensation package is approximately 34 per cent of the difference between the suspension value and the value of their holdings as at May 31, including distributions made up to that date.

Investors have until December 31, 2012 to decide whether they want to accept the offer under the compensation package or not.

Investors who wait more than six months after receiving their offer may lose the ability to complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service about how their offer was calculated.

Justice for Financial Services and Regulatory Legal have each filed for the compensation package to be judicially reviewed.

Documents obtained by Regulatory Legal show the net asset value of the funds fell before the funds were suspended. Between September 17, 2008 and March 12, 2009, the net asset value in the CF Arch cru investment portfolio dropped by 12 per cent from 115.19 to 101.81 while the specialist portfolio fell by 10 per cent from 114.47 to 102.91.

The value of the investment portfolio fell by almost 6 per cent in the two days before the funds’ suspension on March 13 while the specialist portfolio fell by over 4 per cent over the same period.

Recommended

Fitch downgrades six global banks

Fitch Ratings has downgrade the long-term credit rating of six of the world’s biggest banks because their business models are “particularly sensitive” to the challenging financial markets. The banks include Bank of America, Barclays, BNP Paribas, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Fitch says the challenges the banks face are both regulatory, in which […]

Zemek hands Axa IM sterling bond fund to Hayes

Axa Investment Management has announced that Nick Hayes has replaced Theo Zemek as manager on its £130m sterling corporate bond fund. Zemek is now set to focus on her role as global head of fixed income at Axa IM, she is also a member of the Axa IM board. Zemek will remain as deputy manager […]

Jisa, Jisa, baby

Last week, I introduced the subject of tax-effective savings for children. I spent a little time considering the options available and then focused on the newest option available, the junior Isa (Jisa). I would like to continue that theme this week with a (reasonably) detailed look at the regulations applicable to the Jisa. As you […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment