View more on these topics

Can May keep her cabinet in line to win a bespoke deal for financial services?


From endless trade disputes to long drawn out speeches from unelected bureaucrats clinging desperately to power – there are some stark similarities between the Star Wars saga and the EU. But as Disney’s latest instalment cleans up at the box office, Prime Minister May has her own cabinet rogues to keep under control.

Whether its Boris making bewildering gaffes on human rights, Dr Fox lamenting on business executives playing golf, or David Davis quashing hopes of a Brexit transition deal for the City, the PM can ill afford any further blunders in 2017.

Particularly as, despite the outspoken trio’s best efforts to waver from the party line, a certain European banking crisis could provide an ideal excuse to tip the renegotiation balance in May’s favour. Believe it or not, the toxic sub-prime mortgage loans that shook the finance sector almost a decade ago continue to weigh down on the European banking system. The oldest lender in the world, Italy’s Monte dei Paschi, has already had more cash pumped into it over the break.

The trouble is that Italy is by no means the only EU country with dodgy loans clogging up its banks’ balance sheets. As a result, there is considerable concern among politicians and financiers that a new banking meltdown could be triggered across Europe. While this may provide an unwelcome distraction for the ECB and the various EU institutions, it presents a clear political point scoring opportunity for the PM and her team.

In order to gain the upper hand, May must control her cabinet colleagues with a taste for political gaffes. Any further slip-ups that directly criticise the EU’s current handling of this crisis will only backfire. Instead, the Government should be using the negativity surrounding Europe’s banking woes as an excuse to promote the UK’s banking stability.

After all, any uprooting of the City’s financial infrastructure to destinations such as Paris or Frankfurt would come at a huge cost to the continent, at a time when European banks are clearly in need of capital. With this in mind, May will need to use her force to keep Boris and co in line if she has any hope of securing a bespoke deal for financial services once the renegotiation war begins.

Tim Focas is a director of financial services at Colloquium


European Parliament vote seals Priips delay

The European Parliament has agreed to the EU’s Priips legislation by siding with the European Council’s decision to hold fire on the regulations. MEPs approved the delay with 561 votes in favour to 9 against and 75 abstentions. The vote approves the so-called silence procedure the Council agreed to after the European Commission, the EU’s executive body, […]


Sipp customer compensated for transfer delay

Sipp providers Curtis Banks and Fidelity must compensate a client after he complained that a pension transfer delay resulted in him losing £14,000. The Pensions Ombudsman upheld the complaint and ordered that Curtis Banks and Fidelity recalculate the compensation payable to the complainant at the settlement date with Curtis Banks paying 64 per cent of […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. May’s government will continue as it started – divided with inter department positioning and private briefings. No 10 is at the forefront of leaked briefings. We may not have a running commentary on how the plan is shaping up because there isn’t one. We do have a running commentary on why there is not a plan. Ministers are at each others throats. There is justifiable concern about the viability of some banks in Eurozone countries but that is a diversion from the real issues facing the UK that May is incapable of facing up to. The UK is not in the Eurozone and will never be. Problems in banks cross borders. Should this fair up the UK will not escape unharmed. Better to be on the inside helping find solutions than being irrelevant on the outside. The free movement of capital means there is also a free movement of debt to where it may be unexpectedly connected. That was the lesson of 2008 for anyone paying attention

  2. Agree with Russell Bruce and Tim Focas. However, Tim’s good comments are based on accepting Brexit will happen, I am not sure it will, and this is why I agree with Russell that things will need sorting from the inside.

    At the moment, ideology is smoothing out the wrinkles from pragmatism. Which is odd for a empiricist nation like Britain, traditionally free from Voltaire and Rousseau views of intellectualism driving endeavour. If the real Britain re-asserts itself (within the cabinet, that’s probably only Greg and Phil, so we’ll need a new government), practicalities hopefully will kill Brexit and a new arrangement under Article 48 will be sought.

Leave a comment