View more on these topics

Cable slams Revenue over tax on endowment payouts

Liberal Democrat Party Treasury spokesman Vincent Cable has written to the Inland Revenue to ask why victims of endowment misselling will be forced to pay tax on their compensation.

The Revenue has made it clear in its latest bulletin that thousands of people getting compensation for misselling claims will have to pay tax on their payout.

But Cable believes the Government should have foreseen any tax costs to misselling victims. He says the Treasury could have looked at introducing legislation that would have protected compensation from tax along similar lines to the clause included in the Finance Act which covers pension misselling.

He has written to Inland Revenue chairman Sir Nich-olas Montagu to ask him to explain the basis for what Cable describes as a highly inequitable and arbitrary decision from the Revenue.

The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants believes the Revenue is taking advantage of people who have already suffered.

Those who could face the highest tax bills include endowment and with-profits bond misselling victims. Their compensation payment will often include a sum to cover the loss of interest they would have received if their money had been placed in a deposit account.

Cable says: “I believe that compensation for pension misselling claims is not taxed,nor are compensation claims for injuries. Surely, the test should be that taxation should be no higher or less than if financial products had matured in the normal way.”

ACCA head of taxation Chas Roy-Chowdhury says: “Trying to capture tax on this money after the event is unacceptable. Many people have suffered severe financial hardship and risked losing their homes as a result of financial misselling.

“It is also highly probable that many of those have already allocated most of the compensation received to repay the huge deficits in their mortgages.”



Tom Baigrie on protection

Consumers and non-specialist IFAs alike often underestimate the amount of cover needed to protect properly against financial disasters. I think this is because we all try to quantify the need in terms of a lump sum which leads to huge errors of estimation and under-insuring. When we buy family financial protection, what we are doing, […]

Ghiloni&#39s parting shots

What is this we hear? A certain Mr Francis Ghiloni, the departing sales and marketing director at Britannic Asset Management, had no less than five, yes five, leaving dos. One for everyone at Opus, a popular Glasgow drinking joint, three for various teams at the business although we hear the compliance team did not get […]

Nvesta – Secure Multi-Tracker Plan

Type: Guaranteed equity bond Aim: Growth linked to the performance of the FTSE 100, S&P 500 and Nikkei 225 indices Minimum-maximum investment: £3,000-£2m, Isa £7,000 Term: Six years Return: 110% growth in the indices Guarantee: Original capital returned in full regardless of performance of indices Closing date: October 22. 2004, October 15, 2004 for Pep/Isa […]

Prudential – PruFund Investment Plan

Type: Smoothed unitised investment bond Aim: Growth and income by investing in a choice of two smoothed managed funds Minimum investment: Lump sum £5,000 Fund links: PruFund growth fund, PruFund growth and income fund Charges: Regular income option &#45 establishment charge 0.45% a year for first five years, annual 1.5% until year 10, thereafter 1%, […]


Guide: 10 required letters — what to send, to whom and when?

This guide from Johnson Fleming will take you through the required communication and also give ideas for additional actions that will ensure your auto-enrolment project is a success. The topics in this guide include: the letters you need to send out; what to send and when; the importance of employee engagement; and what to consider as additional communication.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I have received a compensation for endowment missselling, the smal amount when agreed, had tax deducted at source, based upon a standard rate tax payer.
    As I pay a portion of my income at 40%, I will no doubt have further taxation to pay.

    Ken R

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm