View more on these topics

Brush marks

As readers will no doubt be aware, there has been growing speculation

recently about the possibility of financial advice becoming kitemarked.

My view is that IFAs are really independent financial designers, a bit

like a financial services version of Changing Rooms. Should financial

products be kitemarked like tins of paint or different types of timber? “It

does exactly what it says on the tin” could become “It does exactly what

the kite standard tells it to.”

We understand that the British Standards Institution is setting up a new

technical committee to shadow the International Standards Organisation.

What benefits, if any, could kitemarking bring and to whom? Well let us

begin by looking at the objectives behind providing financial adv-ice in

the first place. Why do people want advice?

Probably because they are unsure of what to do and want the benefit of

professional guidance, people are looking for the most suitable set of

financial solutions for them. I am not alone in arguing this is best

provided by properly trained, qualified and regulated advisers.

What place then for kitemarking? Why have it? As I understand it, the

proposal is that a “standard” would apply to the whole financial process,

including information taken from the consumer (fact-finding) and

information given to him or her – for example, key features, illustrations,

maybe decision trees, etc.

So who would decide what such a standard should be and what financial

products it should relate to? Will this be regulated and unregulated

products? Would we have an international standard and would this be right

for the UK financial services marketplace?

I can see similar standards may apply to the quality of a Diet Coke in

Japan, Europe or the US but to financial services worldwide? Surely, this

would be nigh on impossible given the differences between countries,

cultures and legislation and in how financial services are distributed.

Leaving aside the international dimension, any proposal to kitemark

financial advice in the UK would be to threaten to replace the

professionalism of the financial adviser with a lesser, and potentially

more confusing, system to the consumer.

If the proposal were to kitemark financial products then you are instantly

faced with a number of complexities.

There is a wealth of data which can measure such things as charging

structures and their effect upon the consumer in terms of reduction in

yield, projected funds, early transfer values, etc.

There are also different ways of computing the financial strength of an

organisation and how certain product features are dealt with, such as how

certain illnesses and disabilities are defined, all of which in theory are

capable of being standardised. But there is much that is not.

For example, the skills and flair of a particular fund manager, the

relative likelihood or prospects of good fund performance in the future,

the understanding of how not one, but a range of products, may fit in to

the design of the best financial solution for the consumer.

On the one hand, this may be useful in informing both advisers and

consumers that a product had met certain standards in certain areas. But

it could easily lead consumers who do not seek advice to make the wrong


They could choose an inexpensive kitemarked fund management company, when

a more expensive but far better performing alternative could have been


Is cheapest best or do you get what you pay for? “Does it do exactly what

it says on the tin?” And, if what is potentially being proposed were to

include the provision of information only (as opposed to advice) then the

question arises whether an untrained person should be allowed to “inform”

the consumer in this way.

Furthermore, if this were to be permitted, would it be limited to

non-regulated products only or would it also encompass regulated products?

Presumably both. If so, what place then for regulation and advice?

Surely it would not be proposed that kitemarking should replace regulation

and advice? But if not, how exactly is it going to assist that process?

Possibly only by addingto the compliance burden on IFAs at the same time

as amplifying the potential for consumers not to seek advice and end up


Maybe a better proposition would be for Government, regulator, product

provider, consumer watchdogs and advisers to do everything possible to

encourage the consumer to seek financial advice from a properly qualified

person, who was required to provide suitable advice after the benefit of a

carefully conducted fact-find and comprehensive research – how about making

that the standard?

Oh sorry, we already have and rightly so. Let&#39s not do anything to

jeopardise it.


Scottish Widows Corporate Bond Fund

Scottish Widows has introduced a Corporate Bond Fund aimed at pension schemes in response to rising demands for long-dated gilt-edged securities.The introduction of the fund also coincides with the move towards the minimum funding requirement (MFR) solvency test for pension funds, which has also pushed up demand for bonds as their inclusion in a revised […]

CII calls for awareness of financial exclusion

The Chartered Insurance Institute wants to make IFAs aware of financialexclusion by flagging the subject in the new FPC coursebook out in August.The move comes as the FSA publishes research revealing the extent of theexclu-sion problem.The CII believes IFAs should take a similar approach to the excluded asbanks take to students by pointing them, for […]

Boleat back in loan launch

Former ABI director general and CML founder Mark Boleat is to burst backon the scene with a new mortgage firm.Boleat will only reveal that the company will be a business-to-businessoperation which will do business online but is not “a dotcom in thetraditional sense”. He admits he is not the main backer of the venture.Boleat started […]

Schroder Unit Trusts has introduced its first EuroTech Fund

Schroder Unit Trusts has introduced its first EuroTech Fund because it believes European companies will continue to stay ahead of America in the development of third generation mobile phones, which offer access to the Internet. The fund is not for the faint-hearted. It is most suitable for sophisticated, specialist investors who are prepared to take […]

Iain Chadwick

The Budget 2015: a brief overview

Following George Osborne’s delivery of his sixth Budget as chancellor and the last of this current parliament, we have provided a brief overview of the initiatives put forward in his statement, focusing on the topics that have an impact upon the pensions landscape, savings, personal taxation and businesses.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment