View more on these topics

Bond ambition

The Lincoln corporate bond trust is a unit trust that invests mainly in investment-grade bonds. It is designed to produce an income yield of 6.77 per cent and is managed by Goldman Sachs Asset Management.

Assessing how the fund fits into the market, Webster-Smith says: “With recent volatility in the stockmarkets, the Lincoln corporate bond fund provides a low-risk investment with secure income. There is also a minimal capital gains tax risk with this type of bond fund.”

Milton thinks the fund is an acceptable entrant into the market. Bulgin says: “It is designed for clients looking for a steady, high level of income with a relatively low level of risk to capital. It will join a large number of established funds.”

Moving on to the type of client the fund is likely to attract, Bulgin says: “It is suitable for clients seeking income, who are relatively risk-averse and not too concerned about capital growth.”

Webster-Smith says: “It is suitable for those requiring low-risk investment to balance a portfolio and for cautious investors who want a return on their investment with minimal risk of capital loss.”

He says it is also suitable for lower-band taxpayers or non-taxpayers and investors who want a regular income return. Milton identifies lower-risk clients who appreciate little change to capital values and reasonable income.

Discussing the marketing opportunities the fund might provide, Milton says: “They are reasonably limited. There are no unique selling points.”

Webster-Smith says: “The fund will enable Lincoln to attract investors at a time when many cautious investors may not consider the stockmarket as the right place to put their money. It may also increase the profile of other Lincoln funds.”

Bulgin says: “It is particularly good for Pep transfers and Isas. There is some scope for new Isa and unit trust business.”

Turning to the strong points and useful features of the fund, the panel point to it being managed by Goldman Sachs.

Webster-Smith says: “It can be bought through an Isa or Pep transfer. It invests in government securities and a high percentage of funds in investment-grade bonds with good Standard & Poor&#39s ratings. But it can also invest in riskier bonds with higher returns. And it is linked to Goldman Sachs.”

Bulgin says: “It has a relatively high level of income and is managed by Goldman Sachs.”

Milton points to the sense of security and the management by Goldman Sachs.

Moving on to the investment strategy, Milton says: “The investment strategy is okay but it invests too much in government bonds, which are overvalued in our view. A greater emphasis on corporate bonds would be our preference. Currency opportunities exist too, for example, by investing in Eurobonds now.”

Bulgin thinks the investment strategy appears to be good, with a concentration on investment-grade bonds.

Webster-Smith says: “It is a safe, low-risk investment strategy backed by Goldman Sachs, which has the longest record of bond investment.”

Discussing the drawbacks of the fund, Webster-Smith says: “Lincoln is not very well known compared with other players in the corporate bond market. The fund has a high initial charge and high annual management fees. There are higher yields available from other bond funds and the capital growth this fund offers is very limited.”

Bulgin suggests that there are some corporate bond funds that produce higher levels of income.

Examining Lincoln&#39s reputation, Bulgin says: “Lincoln is not a big name in the IFA market. Also, it is not well known by the investing public.”

Webster-Smith says: “Lincoln&#39s main reputation is within the insurance market. It has an average reputation when compared with M&G, Threadneedle and Aberdeen.”

Milton says: “Lincoln&#39s reputation is acceptable but the connection with a direct salesforce may leave it languishing with the independent sector for some years.”

Analysing Lincoln&#39s past performance record, the panel are on the whole not impressed. Webster-Smith says: “It has a relatively poor performance record. The funds are all very small and any large redemption will have a stormy effect on the fund. Lincoln also has a small range of funds, for example, no main UK equity unit trust. Small funds also reflect that inves-tors are reluctant to support Lincoln funds.”

Milton says: “Lincoln&#39s past performance is acceptable but it is nothing to write home about either.”

Bulgin says: “Lincoln will have some funds that have performed well but within the Lincoln stable there is a vast amount of funds that were formerly managed by companies taken over by Lincoln.”

Identifying the likely competitors for the fund, the panel are unanimous in opting for M&G&#39s corporate bond funds.

Milton cites the Aberdeen high-yield bond, M&G European high-yield bond and Henderson European high-yield bond.

Webster-Smith goes for Threadneedle&#39s corporate bond funds and high-yield bond unit trust. He also highlights corporate bond funds from M&G and Old Mutual.

Bulgin says: “The M&G high-yield corporate bond, ABN Amro high-income and Legal & General fixed-interest could provide competition for the Lincoln fund.”

Turning to the charges, the panel agree that they are high compared with similar funds.

Milton says: “The annual management charge is a bit high for bonds.”

Webster-Smith says: “The 5 per cent initial charge is higher than the competition but the discount offer is good.”

Bulgin says: “The initial charge is on the high side for a bond fund. The annual charge is about average. It is interesting to see that the ann-ual charge is split between income and capital.”

Moving on to the commission, the panel agree it is average for this type of fund.

Looking at the literature, the panel have a mixed response. Webster-Smith says: “The product literature is good. It outlines what corporate bonds are and highlights the fund&#39s link with Goldman Sachs. However, the charges and commission are not clear. It is also unclear who will be running the fund.”

Milton says: “The literature is acceptable but very wordy. It is not very pretty either.”

Summing up, Bulgin says: “There is a lot of competition in the sector. Unless Lincoln&#39s performance is above average it will struggle. For investors looking for higher income levels, there are other funds available, albeit with greater levels of risk.”

Recommended

Online trees offer corporate audits

Scottish Life is launching an online stakeholder decision tree designed to generate an audit trail automatically for advice given to corporate clients. It says the complicated nature of paper-based trees and the regulatory issues surrounding the use of decision trees have created serious problems for IFAs trying to advise clients within a 1 per cent […]

Pru bid for American General off

Prudential&#39s attempt to take over American General has failed after its £14bn bid was beaten by American International Group, the world&#39s largest insurance company.Pru will be receive an immediate termination payment of £419m from American General for breach of the takeover agreement reached earlier this year.A Pru spokesman says: ” American General has concluded the […]

Whose life policy is it, anyway?

The news that online travel company Expedia has moved into profit a year ahead of schedule and that e-bookers is reporting smaller than expected losses suggests not all areas of the online community are suffering as much as others. It is particularly significant for the personal finance industry that travel is one of the markets […]

Prime time for Royal & Sun Alliance

Royal & Sun Alliance has put the focus on individual stock selection with the introduction of the UK prime fund. This Oeic aims to deliver capital growth by investing in a portfolio of around 30 stocks. Investors who want to draw income from the fund can make cash withdrawals under a facility called selector which […]

Unfinished business?

Pension specialist Fiona Tait gives an update on three big announcements from the 2016 Budget – Pensions Advice Allowance (PAA), the Lifetime ISA (LISA) and the pension dashboard. £500 Pensions Advice Allowance What’s new Under current rules it is possible to deduct an adviser charge from a defined contribution pension fund to pay for financial […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com