View more on these topics

Blog: Why continue to line the pockets of fund houses?

Insurance companies and wealth management firms have always put their financial gains and interests before that of any client. Why wouldn’t they? They are in business to make a profit.

The reason they have long promoted product over service is that layers of costs could be built into them. Up until the RDR, these costs sometimes did not even need to be disclosed, or would at least be hidden deep in the small print.

Who pays for substantial offices in the finest locations, with board rooms decorated to the highest standard? Who pays for sponsorship of the world’s most prestigious sporting events, with luxury privileges for those who need to be entertained in order to keep their wealth in the hands of the corporate entity looking after it? Who pays for the mega salaries and obscene bonuses, and for the regulatory fines for misselling to their loyal client bank?

Dennis Hall: Why we are reducing portfolios to just one fund

None of this would be possible if it was not for the investor and their money.

What the industry does is not wrong or illegal. These companies are quite within their rights to spend the income they generate from investors’ money how they wish.

But what if a client could keep more of the profits generated for themselves, rather than give them away to the big corporates?

What if you showed them they could still get the same return on their money, with the same consumer protection and backing of global finance companies, but paid less in investment and management charges?

Technology now gives investors 24/7 access to their money via platforms for 0.27 to 0.3 per cent. Global portfolios can be created for 0.16 to 0.34 per cent OCF with a mixture of tracker and active funds invested in global companies with up to $580bn assets under management. Advisers can take an ongoing advice fee and the total cost to the client should be no more than around 1.2 per cent.

Paul Armson: How standard financial planning can fail clients

Too many advisers layer costs into portfolios without any real consideration as to the impact they have on clients’ money. I call it soap-on-a-rope syndrome: the more people that touch the money, the smaller it gets.

I do not invest in any fund if I cannot see clearly what the cost of investing is and where the investor’s money is held. I do not like ETFs or structured products, and definitely not life assurance or investment house managed multi-asset funds. If an adviser can create a global portfolio for 1.2 per cent, why is the industry average still in the region of 2.3 per cent with advice?

The impact on a client’s money over their lifetime of paying that extra 1.1 per cent more than they need to is daylight robbery.

Perhaps the industry has its own interests to protect but without the client’s money, the industry would not exist.

 Hannah Goldsmith is founder of Goldsmith Financial Solutions


Robo firms’ assets and customer numbers creep up

Robo firms saw their assets under advice grow by more than 80 per cent in the 12 months to the end of the second quarter as customer numbers also boosted. Analysis from consultancy Boring Money on the DIY investment market shows robo advisers saw AUA increase to £2.6bn from £1.4bn 12 months ago. Users of […]


What do advisers charge for pension consolidation?

Advisers charge an average of close to £3,000 for advice on pension consolidation, research has found. A survey of just over 100 advisers conducted by consumer champion Which? in May this year found that, on average, financial advisers are charging £2,879 to roll multiple pensions worth up to £150,000 into a single self-invested personal pension. […]


How much are advisers charging for pension transfers?

Defined benefit pension transfer charges are being put under the microscope again as the regulator turns over more potential conflicts of interest. With the British Steel Pension Scheme the latest to dominate headlines and the FCA ready to interrogate further as it extends its review to include all firms authorised to give pension transfer advice, […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Someone else who is patently not confortable with investing.

    I don’t care how much Terry Smith, Nick Train and others in the same mold make. They do well for clients and also for me. I wonder what’s in your own portfolio Hanna, how much is in it and whether it has weathered the market drops as well as the rises over (say) the last 20 years?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm