View more on these topics

Berkeley Burke demands suitability report for client transfers

Berkeley Burke is refusing to approve instructions to transfer clients’ investments without seeing advisers’ suitability reports.

In emails seen by Money Marketing, the Sipp provider says it has adopted the requirement following a recent visit from the FCA and points to a 2009 FSA thematic review into Sipp operators.

But the report only says obtaining copies of the adviser’s suitability reports is an example of good practice.”

Berkeley Burke demanded to see a suitability report when Barretts Financial Solutions senior partner Kim Barrett told the provider to transfer investments from the Parmenion platform to Transact.

Talbot & Muir head of technical support Claire Trott says: “We would not request to see a suitability report, although we have been sent them in the past. We have to trust regulated advisers are giving the most appropriate advice. 

“I cannot see how the Sipp firm can check the report sufficiently if they are not a regulated adviser themselves.”

Rowanmoor head of pensions technical services Robert Graves says: “At one stage there were suggestions that Sipp provider should be asking for suitability letters and such like. But it’s pretty clear from the FCA statements that, no, a Sipp provider isn’t responsible for assessing the suitability of an investment.

“How do we know what’s suitable without knowing the client? That’s the adviser’s job. It’s a very dangerous game to get into.”

Barrett says: “If you’re telling me product providers are going to ask for suitability reports, I think it will bring transfers to a stop, and could breach data protection rules.

“The FCA needs to step in and bring clarity to the situation.”

Berkeley Burke declined to comment.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. This seems a bit overkill by BB. If the client was transferring out from a platform or another regulated product into a UCIS or similar, then BB might have a better reason to make such a request?

  2. The unintended consequence for providers, by requesting to see a copy of the report and they processing the transfer, is that they could be seen to confirming that the advice is appropriate. This could then lead to the provider sharing in any future liabilities if the advice is found to be wanting. Proceed with caution.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com