View more on these topics

Battle tax

HMRC last week changed its position on VAT liability but the issue remains a bone of contention among advisers and some say that the new guidance impugns a central tenet of the RDR. Rachael Adams reports

Last week, HM Revenue & Customs announced it has changed its stance on determining when VAT is applicable when paying for financial advice, saying liability will be based on the intention of the service rather than the outcome.

Previous guidance stated VAT would be payable on advice but not on product sales or implementation, sparking confusion from IFAs as to where the line is drawn between the two services.

Although HMRC’s new position clarifies some of the previous issues, the question now is whether the new guidance contradicts the intention of the retail
The FSA says the

RDR’s aim is “to address the potential for adviser remuneration to distort consumer outcomes” and “to have charging structures based on the level of service advisers provide, rather than the particular product they recommend”.

HMRC’s VAT guidance seems to encourage the opposite by saying advice is exempt from VAT where the intention of the provision of advice is to end in the sale of a product.

An HMRC spokesman says: “The VAT liability of the process is governed by the intention. If the intention of the agreement between the customer and the adviser is to enter a process leading to the arrangement of an exempt transaction, this is VAT-exempt intermediation.”

This seems to set HMRC’s VAT rules against one of the FSA’s central intentions for the RDR.

Kleinwort Benson private client tax specialist Graeme Stenson says: “Making sure advisers’ intentions at least are clear is a good move. But I think that unless IFAs accept that what they are doing is mainly advice and is VAT-able, deciding on the outcome at the outset undermines the RDR’s aim of stamping out product-led advice.”

The fact advisers will have to decide upon and articulate the outcome of a transaction before the client meeting has taken place is something that Plan Money director Peter Chadborn regards as contravening the RDR.

He says: “To move away from a product-led advice scenario, adviser models are having to incorporate fees for pure advice to prove non-bias. Yet it is impossible upon first engagement with clients to know if any part of the advice will result in a product.”

Similarly, Baker Tilly tax partner Ian Carpenter believes HMRC’s guidance could pose a threat to RDR objectives. He says: “There is a risk of distortion in that people will seek to expressly opt for product-led advice to avoid a perceived additional VAT charge, rather than because it is what they actually want.”

The additional cost of VAT to the cost of advice is not insignificant at a time when many IFAs are having to wean clients off the idea that advice is not free in the first place.

Some advisers say they are concerned that the addition of the 20 per cent VAT charge will put some potential clients off independent advice entirely – an outcome that also runs counter to the FSA’s stated intention for the RDR.

Informed Choice managing director Martin Bamford says: “It seems a big leap to make from seeing advice as free under commission to not only having advice charged for explicitly but also applying VAT at the same time. Maybe people will accept VAT two or three years after the RDR but it could be too much all in one go at the start.”

Stenson agrees the public could be discouraged from seeking advice as a result of unfavourable VAT liability. He says: “Paying VAT rubs salt in sore wounds. Furthermore, there is no tax relief on the total charge as there would be if the advice was wrapped in a product.”

The new guidance also does nothing to ease the administrative burden on IFAs as advisers will still have to keep records of all business that is VAT-exempt and document why.

Carpenter says: “I do not think this guidance will remove the administrative issues IFAs would have had with separating the engagements of product and advice.”

Although Bamford welcomes the statement from HMRC and says it brings more clarity to the overlap of advice and implementation, Carpenter says there still a lot of room for confusion.

He believes advisers may have to familiarise themselves with more legislation to get a better understanding where the line between implementation and advice lies.
He says: “There is a clear rationale of rulings at UK and EU level focusing on what constitutes an intermediary financial service. This is likely to be a better guide than intuition in the absence of more concrete guidance from HMRC.”

Bamford agrees that seeking external help when separating product and advice is the best method. Bamford says: “We go to our accountant. I am not sure you would get a much clearer response if you went to HMRC, so seeking professional tax advice is the right move.”

Despite HMRC’s change of heart, the VAT liability will remain a bone of contention for advisers. Chadborn says: “Many IFA firms are still struggling with the concept of adviser-charging, so the VAT issue is another aspect to muddy the waters.”


Demographic dangers

Saga director general Ros Altmann says more must be done to warn some demographics they may be better off not saving into a pension. At a conference fringe event, she said: “I am worried about people in their 50s, low-paid, maybe renters, who will be the first group of people to retire under this auto-enrolment […]


Money Advice Service chief defends TV ad claims

Money Advice Service chief executive Toby Hobman has defended the use of the words free, unbiased and independent in its recent TV ad. In an interview with Money Marketing at the LibDem conference in Birmingham this week, Hobman said the use of the wording was justified and was not intended to undermine the role of […]


Tom Baigrie: The dangers of consolidation

Robert Reid recently wrote in these pages of the increasing likelihood of consumer detriment as a side-effect of the consolidation among life insurers. I am not sure the FSA is alert to it yet but I believe the Financial Ombudsman Service’s caseload caused by this issue is growing. The way these things tend to happen […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm