View more on these topics

Barclays review attacks high pay of elite ‘group of 70’

Barclays Rain 480

An internal review into Barclays has attacked the significantly higher pay of its most senior executives after identifying an elite ‘group of 70’ within the bank.

The independent review, led by former BBC director-general Anthony Salz and published today, was commissioned in July 2012 in the wake of the Libor rigging scandal when Barclays’ reputation was hammered by £290m worth of global fines.

The report makes 34 recommendations to improve Barclays’ culture, standards and practices. The review said Barclays’ staff pay reflected the industry average until it moved into the ‘group of 70’ or most senior and highly paid executives.

It says: “Compensation for the ‘group of 70’ was consistently and significantly above the median compared to peer banks. For example, in 2010 average pay to these executives was overall 35 per cent more than the market benchmark for their positions.”

Salz recommends the bank’s long-term award structure should be “simpler and transparent” while bonuses should be linked to controlling risk as well as profits.

On Libor rigging the report blamed cultural deficiencies on the trading floor, ineffective supervision and profit-driven targets and bonuses that ignored legal or ethical issues.

It also investigated the sale of payment protection insurance at the bank and blamed “aggressively pushed sales”. One example in 2009 noted a sales person would earn two and a half times more commission for selling a loan with PPI compared to a loan without PPI.

It says: “The culture of the bank had developed into one which at times valued meeting financial targets more than meeting customer needs.”

Barclays chairman Sir David Walker says: “The report makes for uncomfortable reading in parts. That is bound to be the case when one asks for an independent examination of this kind, and we must learn from the findings.”

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. It takes a special report to identify that the Senior Management are over paid even by Banker’s standards. What next? The pope is a catholic, bears defecate in the woods?

    Bonuses contributed to PPI miss selling. Who was in charge for part of this, and provided insufficient supervison. The new CEO Jenkins.

    Does anyone really believethat a frew smoke screen reports and some cosmetic adjustments will really change things at Barclays? At least there does not seem to be any further noises about ending free banking.

  2. Just read in other n ews letters some more about this report.

    The report on Barclays recommends linking pay to the Bank’s long term success. The report cost £17m, which equates to nearly £70,000 per page or £28,333 per individual interviewed. The cost is nearly the same as one year’s remuneration for Bob Diamond. The article does not say how long it took to compile but the daily cost is probably equally astronomic. Although not privy to the report, the conclusions that have been released are rather obvious. Barclays paid it’s senior staff too much, those staff thought they were above the law, Management control failed, there is a poor culture with Barclays. Jenkins says most of the issues have already been addressed (He was in a position be a cause of many of the issues). Barclays wasting shareholders money again. I could have arrived at the same conclusions and would have only charged £10m

Leave a comment