View more on these topics

‘Banks should concede defeat on fees’

Which? is calling on banks to surrender in their legal battle with the Office of Fair Trading over charges.

The Office of Fair Trading last week won the first stage of its test case on bank charges after the High Court ruled that such charges can be assessed for fairness.

Mr Justice Andrew Smith agreed that the charges are covered by rules governing the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulation 1999.

A further court hearing scheduled for May 22 will outline the timetable for the next stage of the test case where the court will decide whether the charges are unfair and, if so, what a fair charge should be.

An OFT statement says: “This is an important early milestone for our investigation into this area of high consumer interest. We are now analysing the implications of the judgment for our overall investigation into the fairness of the terms.”

Which? personal finance campaigns manager Doug Taylor welcomes the High Court ruling and calls on banks to concede defeat.

He says: “The banks should do the right thing now, concede defeat, agree with the OFT what constitutes a fair unauthorised overdraft fee and refund their customers as soon as possible.

“If they appeal, drag their heels in refunding their customers or try to introduce back-door charges to recoup their losses, their customers will see this as adding insult to injury.”

However, the judge agreed with the banks that their charges are not “unenforceable penalties” and that fees advertised in their terms and conditions can be charged.

Complaints against charges will remain on hold until the final judgment is made.

Liberal Democrat Shadow Chancellor Vincent Cable says: “Banks can receive unrivalled guarantees and support from taxpayers when things go wrong but continue to make huge profits at the expense of their customers.”


A shaw thing

Annie Shaw is a freelance financial journalist
To One Aldwych Hotel for an early-morning briefing about Yorkshire Building Society’s e-bond. After PR doyen David Holmes had wiped the dripping egg from our chins as we consumed the fare that the Northerners call “breakfast teacakes”, communications cutie Tanya Jackson was anxious to dispel any myth that the new savings product was an “Eeh bah gum” bond although the not ungenerous interest rates did seem to go against the stereotype of the tightfisted Northerner.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm