View more on these topics

Aviva overhauls IP underwriting practices

Aviva has made changes to the way it underwrites its income protection policy, resulting in over 95 per cent of customers now being underwritten on an own occupation basis.

The insurer says before the review of its IP policy, which began in October, around 80 per cent of occupations were underwritten on an own occupation basis.

A total of 221 occupations previously classed as higher risk, like surveyors, vets and journalists, have now been moved into a lower occupational class following the review, resulting in lower premiums.

Additionally, a further 21 occupational classes that had previously been declined are now covered, including roofers, tillers and scaffholders.

Aviva has also raised many of the non-medical limits on its IP policy so that applicants across all age ranges will receive a higher level of automatic cover without the need for a nurse screening or full medical examination, regardless of disclosure.

Chief medical underwriter Jon Parker says: “We have rigorously challenged the market’s classification of occupations and industries at certain prices and the particular definitions of incapacity, as the risks once associated with many occupations are no longer as high thanks to advances in technology and better workplace health and safety. As a result, we have significantly improved our terms and premiums for customers in line with the risk their occupations bring today, not 20 or 30 years ago.

“We are also pleased that the great majority of occupations will now be accepted on an own occupation basis, enabling customers who are unable to do their job through illness or injury to more readily and swiftly access the benefits and rehabilitation support they need.”


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Well done Aviva. its about time the industry started to treat IP as a serious product with some common sense to own occupation classes. Any occupation gives the providers too much of a get out clause not to pay. I hope the rest will now follow suit.

  2. The risk posed by these occupations has to be accomodated somehow – I’d assume then premium rates will go up?

  3. I had hoped that the article was going to be about how they have improved the application process. No point in improving the product if they cannot deal with an application properly.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm