Autumn Statement: Calls to scrap pension exit fees and extend stamp duty exemption


By Sam Brodbeck and Tessa Norman

George Osborne is being urged to use next week’s Autumn Statement to scrap pension exit penalties, the new annual allowance taper and extend the stamp duty exemption to equity Isas and Sipps.

Ahead of the Chancellor’s speech, Hargreaves Lansdown head of pension research Tom McPhail says the Government needs to intervene over early exit charges on pension policies.

He says: “We need some intervention to curtail the more egregious transfer penalties that are sometimes contractually legitimate but in the context of pension freedoms no longer justifiable.

“I think some of the exit penalties that are written into contracts from 10, 20, 30 years ago are no longer justifiable in today’s environment. I’m looking at the Government to intervene on those.”

In September the FCA published its audit of exit penalties levied by providers.

It found nearly half a million pension customers have policies subject to exit fees of over £1,000.

Tax relief

Aegon wants the Treasury to U-turn on its plans to taper the annual allowance on pension contributions for those earning over £150,000 from April 2016.

Regulatory strategy manager Kate Smith says: “We would like the Government to scrap the lifetime allowance and the annual allowance taper. These are very counter intuitive.

“At some point in time we expect there will be a massive change so we think the Government should wait rather than putting these complicated rules in place that do not help people.”

Almary Green managing director Carl Lamb agrees: “I would like to see no further changes to pensions legislation and the scrapping of the lifetime allowance.

“I would also like to see an increase in the amount that can be put into Isas to encourage consumers to save.”

Stamp duty exemption

The Wealth Management Association wants the stamp duty exemption on AIM shares extended to include long-term investments such as equity Isas and Sipps.

It says: “The cost to the Exchequer is difficult to quantify precisely but when WMA commissioned work in this area in 2014 it was estimated that so-called bought Isa consideration of £15.7bn would result in loss of stamp duty reserve tax revenue at £78.6m.

“It would, however, enable the Government to market the Isa as a truly tax-free savings and investment wrapper.”

AJ Bell thinks the Government should align the amount non-earners’ can save into a pension with Junior Isa limits to boost saving for children.

The £3,600 annual allowance for non-earners has stayed at the same level since it was created in 2001. Junior Isas, on the other hand, allow contributions of up to £4,080 a year.

AJ Bell head of technical resources Gareth James says: “One of the key uses of the non-earner pension allowance is for parents or grandparents to save for children.

“Aligning this with the Jisa allowance to create a single, consistent children’s saving allowance across both Jisas and pensions would make it easier for parents and grandparents to understand how much they can invest. It would also enable those with income from sources other than traditional earnings to save more for their retirement.”

Adviser view

Tim Page, director, Page Russell

The Chancellor may attack salary sacrifice because he is losing a lot of money through that due to auto-enrolment. I also expect to see a crackdown on contract workers.

Now the Government has clamped down so much on the annual allowance, I would like to see the madness that is the lifetime allowance removed.

But given the poor borrowing numbers for October, Osborne will not be in a particularly generous mood. Any money he has spare will be needed to make the cuts to tax credits more palatable.



Autumn Statement set for late November

Chancellor George Osborne has set the date for the Autumn Statement and the Spending Review in late November. The Chancellor will present both on November 25. Osborne has additionally asked Office for Budget Responsibility chairman Robert Chote to prepare an autumn forecast for the same date. One potential announcement would be a follow up to […]


BBA warns Treasury against capping Isas in Autumn Statement

The British Bankers’ Association has warned the Treasury against any cap on the total amopunt held in Isas, claiming it would undermine the Isa brand and stability of savings. Over the summer the Government floated the idea of a £100,000 Isa cap to stop tax incentives for “Isa millionaires”. But in its submission to the […]

Guarantees in the retirement income market

Lorna Blyth, Royal London  Do guarantees benefit customers and, if so, when? To answer this conundrum we commissioned Millimans, a global actuarial consulting firm, to conduct an independent review of the UK retirement income market and whether guarantees really do offer customers better value for money. The brief The study was one of the most comprehensive undertaken […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. It’s all well and good banging on about old charging structures written on old policies, but they are contractual terms and reflected the costs to the companies at the time. Let’s not forget how much commission was paid out. If you are going to set a precedent on nullifying contract terms on Pensions, who is to say where it will stop. We are just reviewing the terms on a regular investment plan and the charges and surrender penalties are far worse than any pension!

  2. So that’s the end of the FCA’s involvement in reviewing punitive exit terms on legacy policies is it?

  3. Exit fees are only half the picture. If you hold an older plan it will not necessarily be able to accommodate the new freedoms (E.G. take PCLS and leave rest invested). In which case some of the firms offer a transfer to one of their more modern plans, but charge for the privilege. What is so absolutely stupid is that if you then decide to transfer to another provider – there is no charge. (Thank you Standard Life!) But of course to do this you would have to engage an adviser and pay a fee. So the customer is stuffed either way. This is TCF??

Leave a comment